Tennis stats
The tool for those who build their own bet. Filter and find your value.
Filter by win rate, aces, double faults, service games and break points per player and surface. Build your read of the match with real data. How our model works → Total games in tennis: what actually predicts it (and what doesn't) →
Filters are Premium: date, league, search, ranges and favourites. The full table, sorting and every match analysis stay free. Go Premium →
Showing 76–92 of 92 matches (page 2 of 2).
Click a column to sort; click again to reverse. · Swipe the table sideways →
| ⓘ | Date | Tournament | Players | Surface ⓘ | Form ⓘ | Win % ⓘ | Win % surf. ⓘ | Sets ⓘ | Games ⓘ | Games line ⓘ | Aces ⓘ | Double faults ⓘ | 1st serve % ⓘ | Break % ⓘ | H2H ⓘ | Odds ⓘ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 23/10, 16:00View analysis ↗ | W75 Saguenay | Hiromi Abe | – Bo3 | 90% | – | 1.8-0.4 | 12.4-7.7 | – | 0.4 | 1.7 | 62.4% | 51.5% | – | 1.25 | ||
| Carolina Kuhl | 70% | – | 1.5-0.9 | 12.1-9.5 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 61.4% | 58.6% | 3.75 | |||||||
| 23/10, 16:30View analysis ↗ | ATP Almaty | Alexander Bublik | Hard Bo3 | 50% | 50% (8) | 1.5-1.3 | 14.7-13.4 | o 1.80 L 24.5 u 1.90 |
13.1 | 3.8 | 77.3% | 45.9% | 1–2 | 1.73 | ||
| Karen Khachanov | 70% | 70% (10) | 1.5-1.1 | 14.5-12.7 | 8 | 1.7 | 79.8% | 45.3% | 2.10 | |||||||
| 23/10, 17:00View analysis ↗ | Challenger Fort Worth | Mees Rottgering | Hard Bo3 | 70% | 70% (10) | 1.4-0.7 | 11.2-9.2 | – | 3.8 | 4.2 | 74% | 49.2% | – | 2.25 | ||
| Darwin Blanch | 80% | 80% (10) | 1.7-0.7 | 12.9-10.6 | 9.2 | 2.6 | 76.1% | 37.7% | 1.57 | |||||||
| 23/10, 17:00View analysis ↗ | W50 Cherbourg | Veronika Podrez | Hard Bo3 | 60% | 33% (3) | 1.4-0.9 | 11.2-8 | – | 1.9 | 4.6 | 66.8% | 46% | – | 1.33 | ||
| Katarina Zavatska | 50% | 43% (7) | 1.1-1 | 9.5-10.3 | 0.2 | 2 | 58.3% | 46.2% | 3.25 | |||||||
| 23/10, 17:00View analysis ↗ | M15 Ithaca | Alec Deckers | Hard Bo3 | 90% | – | 1.9-0.6 | 13.9-10 | – | 10.6 | 3.9 | 79.8% | 43.5% | – | 1.67 | ||
| Oliver Ojakaar | 70% | 75% (4) | 1.6-0.6 | 11.4-9 | 5.9 | 1.6 | 71.9% | 50.1% | 2.10 | |||||||
| 23/10, 17:00View analysis ↗ | M15 Ithaca | Nicolas Arseneault | Hard Bo3 | 50% | 0% (3) | 1-1.2 | 10-9.5 | – | 4.6 | 2.4 | 67.7% | 51.1% | – | 1.50 | ||
| Rodrigo Fernandes | 80% | 83% (6) | 1.6-0.6 | 11.5-7.6 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 74.7% | 48% | 2.50 | |||||||
| 23/10, 17:00View analysis ↗ | Challenger Cali | Gustavo Heide | Clay Bo3 | 80% | 78% (9) | 1.7-0.7 | 12.4-9.9 | – | 7.4 | 4 | 77.4% | 42.6% | 2–1 | 1.11 | ||
| Santiago Rodriguez Taverna | 70% | 70% (10) | 1.4-0.9 | 11.4-9.7 | 4.6 | 2.7 | 72.8% | 33.6% | 6.00 | |||||||
| 23/10, 17:00View analysis ↗ | Challenger Cali | Felipe Meligeni Rodrigues Alves | Clay Bo3 | 70% | 70% (10) | 1.4-0.6 | 10.1-7.3 | – | 2.5 | 1.5 | 69.6% | 41.6% | 1–0 | 1.25 | ||
| Carlos Maria Zarate | 70% | 40% (5) | 1.4-0.7 | 10.4-9 | 3.4 | 1.8 | 72.4% | 40.4% | 3.75 | |||||||
| 23/10, 17:00View analysis ↗ | Challenger Lisbon | Andrea Pellegrino | Clay Bo3 | 30% | 29% (7) | 1-1.5 | 10.3-12.5 | – | 4.2 | 3 | 67.9% | 34.7% | – | 1.44 | ||
| Svyatoslav Gulin | 80% | 80% (10) | 1.6-0.5 | 11.3-7.2 | 2.3 | 1.4 | 70.4% | 52.6% | 2.63 | |||||||
| 23/10, 17:30View analysis ↗ | M15 Maceio | Dante Pagani | Clay Bo3 | 30% | 13% (8) | 0.8-1.6 | 9.7-11.6 | – | 1.3 | 2 | 59.2% | 39.8% | – | 4.33 | ||
| Pedro Sakamoto | 80% | 75% (8) | 1.6-0.6 | 12.2-9.7 | 2.9 | 1.1 | 74.6% | 43.3% | 1.20 | |||||||
| 23/10, 17:30View analysis ↗ | M15 Maceio | Oscar Jose Gutierrez | Clay Bo3 | 50% | 38% (8) | 1.1-1.1 | 10-9.7 | – | 1.6 | 3.7 | 69.5% | 54.1% | – | 2.38 | ||
| Lorenzo Gagliardo | 80% | 83% (6) | 1.6-0.6 | 12-7.2 | 1.8 | 0.5 | 68% | 56.3% | 1.53 | |||||||
| 23/10, 17:45View analysis ↗ | M25 Sarreguemines | Philip Henning | Hard Bo3 | 60% | 50% (6) | 1.2-0.9 | 11.4-9.7 | – | 3.1 | 1.1 | 68.7% | 31.2% | – | 1.22 | ||
| Louis Wessels | 70% | 0% (1) | 1.5-0.7 | 12.6-10.2 | 4.1 | 3.3 | 74.9% | 51.3% | 4.00 | |||||||
| 23/10, 18:30View analysis ↗ | ATP Brussels | Arthur Fils | Clay Bo3 | 70% | – | 1.6-1 | 13.2-10.6 | o 2.00 L 23.5 u 1.72 |
8.3 | 2.6 | 73.6% | 47.2% | – | 1.53 | ||
| Alex Michelsen | 60% | – | 1.9-0.9 | 15.3-12.2 | 6.9 | 4.8 | 73.8% | 47.9% | 2.50 | |||||||
| 23/10, 19:00View analysis ↗ | ATP Lyon | Flavio Cobolli | Hard Bo3 | 50% | 50% (10) | 1.5-1.6 | 13.9-15.7 | o 1.90 L 23.5 u 1.80 |
5.9 | 3 | 69.9% | 39.4% | 0–1 | 2.63 | ||
| Brandon Nakashima | 60% | 60% (10) | 1.4-1.2 | 13.9-12.7 | 10.5 | 1.6 | 75.6% | 36.1% | 1.50 | |||||||
| 23/10, 20:00View analysis ↗ | ATP Brussels | Jan-Lennard Struff | Clay Bo3 | 60% | – | 1.6-1 | 13.3-12.4 | o 1.90 L 23.5 u 1.80 |
10.8 | 3.8 | 76.4% | 36% | 1–1 | 2.75 | ||
| Zizou Bergs | 60% | – | 1.5-1 | 13.6-11.6 | 6.9 | 3.2 | 76% | 39.4% | 1.44 | |||||||
| 23/10, 20:30View analysis ↗ | ATP Lyon | Luca Van Assche | Hard Bo3 | 60% | 60% (10) | 1.3-1.1 | 12-11.8 | o 1.80 L 21.5 u 1.90 |
5.4 | 3.9 | 70.3% | 33% | 1–0 | 3.00 | ||
| Lorenzo Musetti | 60% | 60% (10) | 1.5-0.9 | 12.7-10.5 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 71.7% | 54.9% | 1.40 | |||||||
| 24/10, 07:00View analysis ↗ | WTA Ningbo WD | Bucsa/Melichar-Martinez | Hard Bo3 | 80% | 80% (10) | 1.7-0.6 | 14.2-10.2 | – | 1.7 | 2.4 | 68.2% | 65.4% | – | 1.83 | ||
| Guo/Mladenovic | 60% | 56% (9) | 1.5-1 | 13.5-12.3 | 0.5 | 4.5 | 65.8% | 52.9% | 1.83 |
Frequently asked questions
What is surface Elo?
A rating computed separately for clay, hard, grass and carpet: a player can be much stronger on one surface than another.
What do aces and double faults measure?
Aces are winning serves (serve power); double faults are two serve misses in a row (consistency). Both help estimate games and sets.
How does BetsTalent calculate probabilities?
With an in-house model: opponent-adjusted Elo and, in football, Poisson/Dixon-Coles with per-team attack and defence. In tennis, Elo by surface. No raw averages.