Tennis stats
The tool for those who build their own bet. Filter and find your value.
Filter by win rate, aces, double faults, service games and break points per player and surface. Build your read of the match with real data. How our model works →
Combine the filters (min/max) to see only the matches that fit your bet. Hover the ⓘ on each filter, or click a match for its full analysis (history, H2H and key facts).
Showing 76–136 of 136 matches (page 2 of 2).
Click a column to sort; click again to reverse. · Swipe the table sideways →
| ⓘ | Date | Tournament | Players | Form ⓘ | Win % ⓘ | Sets ⓘ | Games ⓘ | Aces ⓘ | Double faults ⓘ | 1st serve % ⓘ | Break % ⓘ | H2H ⓘ | Odds ⓘ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/07, 18:00View analysis ↗ | W35 Amstelveen | Anouck Vrancken Peeters | 40% | 1.2-1.3 | 11.3-12 | 0.8 | 10.1 | 62.2% | 52.4% | – | 1.83 | ||
| Antonia Stoyanov | 80% | 1.6-0.5 | 11-8 | 1.1 | 3 | 66.3% | 50.8% | 1.83 | |||||
| 02/07, 18:00View analysis ↗ | M25 Ajaccio | Hugo Grenier | 20% | 0.4-1.8 | 8.1-12.6 | 6.3 | 3.2 | 65.5% | 29.2% | – | 1.73 | ||
| Paul Inchauspe | 80% | 1.7-0.6 | 13.1-9.1 | 6.4 | 2.3 | 74% | 41% | 2.00 | |||||
| 02/07, 18:30View analysis ↗ | M15 Getxo | Pedro Rodenas | 60% | 1.4-0.9 | 11.2-9.5 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 62% | 47.9% | 1–0 | 1.22 | ||
| Pavlos Tsitsipas | 70% | 1.5-0.7 | 11.8-9.9 | 5.2 | 3.6 | 72.2% | 44.4% | 4.00 | |||||
| 02/07, 18:30View analysis ↗ | Premier Padel Bordeaux | Coello/Tapia | 100% | 2-0.1 | 13-7.6 | 0 | 0 | 74.2% | 48.7% | – | 1.07 | ||
| Gil/Sanchez | 30% | 0.8-1.6 | 10.7-12.2 | 0 | 0.1 | 59.5% | 34.4% | 7.50 | |||||
| 02/07, 19:00View analysis ↗ | W35 Aix-les-Bains | Astrid Lew Yan Foon | 30% | 0.7-1.4 | 8.5-11.2 | 2.5 | 3.1 | 63.9% | 43.7% | – | 2.63 | ||
| Oceane Dodin | 50% | 1.2-1.2 | 9.9-12.3 | 10.3 | 5 | 66.1% | 40.9% | 1.44 | |||||
| 02/07, 20:00View analysis ↗ | W50 Elvas | Lucie Havlickova | 30% | 1-1.5 | 11.7-12.2 | 6.5 | 7.1 | 66.7% | 58.7% | – | 1.33 | ||
| Stephanie Judith Visscher | 60% | 1.3-0.9 | 10.8-8.3 | 4 | 2.7 | 74.2% | 51.8% | 3.25 | |||||
| 02/07, 20:00View analysis ↗ | W50 Elvas | Elena Micic | 60% | 1.1-1.2 | 10.8-10.7 | 2.2 | 7.5 | 65.1% | 39.3% | – | 2.63 | ||
| Han Shi | 50% | 1-1.2 | 9.5-9.3 | 2.4 | 4.2 | 65.3% | 37.5% | 1.44 | |||||
| 02/07, 21:00View analysis ↗ | W15 San Diego | Alexandra Vagramov | 60% | 1.2-1 | 9.9-8.9 | 2.3 | 7.3 | 64.1% | 49.6% | – | 1.36 | ||
| Maria Aytoyan | 60% | 1.4-0.8 | 11.8-9.5 | 0.6 | 3.4 | 62% | 59.9% | 3.00 | |||||
| 02/07, 21:00View analysis ↗ | W15 San Diego | Krisha Mahendran | 70% | 1.5-0.7 | 10.5-8.1 | 0.7 | 2.2 | 59.4% | 57.1% | – | 1.53 | ||
| Anya Arora | 60% | 1.3-1.1 | 11.5-9.6 | 0.5 | 4 | 53.5% | 40% | 2.38 | |||||
| 02/07, 21:00View analysis ↗ | M15 San Diego | Rafael De Alba | 50% | 1-1.3 | 8.2-11 | 0.9 | 3.9 | 58% | 42% | – | 5.50 | ||
| Theodore Dean | 60% | 1.3-1 | 11.7-10.3 | 0.8 | 3.9 | 63% | 46.8% | 1.13 | |||||
| 02/07, 21:00View analysis ↗ | M15 San Diego | Matic Kriznik | 80% | 1.6-0.5 | 10.6-7.6 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 60.7% | 38.7% | – | 2.00 | ||
| Vit Kalina | 60% | 1.3-0.9 | 10-9.8 | 1.8 | 3.5 | 65% | 61.9% | 1.73 | |||||
| 02/07, 21:00View analysis ↗ | M15 San Diego | Maxwell Exsted | 50% | 1-1.3 | 11.4-12 | 0.8 | 1.8 | 61.9% | 37.3% | – | 2.50 | ||
| Bryce Nakashima | 70% | 1.4-0.8 | 12.1-8.8 | 5.5 | 2.1 | 79.6% | 40.5% | 1.50 | |||||
| 02/07, 21:30View analysis ↗ | W50 Elvas | Anna Kubareva | 90% | 1.8-0.4 | 12.4-7.3 | 0.2 | 5.6 | 67.2% | 47.2% | 1–0 | 2.50 | ||
| Hina Inoue | 50% | 1.1-1 | 10.1-9.6 | 4.2 | 2.6 | 69.3% | 42.7% | 1.50 | |||||
| 02/07, 22:30View analysis ↗ | M15 San Diego | Liam Krall | 50% | 1.2-1.1 | 10.5-10.3 | 2.5 | 3.7 | 68.2% | 49.7% | – | 1.22 | ||
| Roshan Santhosh | 60% | 1.2-1.1 | 9.7-10.7 | 1.7 | 2.3 | 56% | 30.3% | 4.00 | |||||
| 02/07, 22:30View analysis ↗ | W15 San Diego | Alina Shcherbinina | 90% | 1.8-0.3 | 12-5.9 | 1.1 | 4.6 | 67.5% | 49.8% | 1–0 | 1.73 | ||
| Anne Christine Lutkemeyer Obregon | 70% | 1.6-0.8 | 13.2-10.6 | 2.1 | 4.7 | 63.8% | 43.2% | 2.00 | |||||
| 02/07, 22:30View analysis ↗ | M15 San Diego | Benjamin O'Connell | 50% | 1.1-1.1 | 9.2-9.9 | 1.6 | 2.9 | 64.1% | 37.9% | – | 4.50 | ||
| Noah Zamora | 60% | 1.2-1 | 10.9-9.9 | 3 | 0.9 | 66.2% | 38.3% | 1.17 | |||||
| 02/07, 23:00View analysis ↗ | Challenger Cary MD | Reynolds/Watt | 50% | 1.2-1.1 | 14.3-14.1 | 3.6 | 2.2 | 77.7% | 41.9% | – | 1.28 | ||
| Ayeni/Cook | 50% | 1-1.2 | 10.4-11 | 3.6 | 3 | 69.4% | 33.6% | 3.50 | |||||
| 03/07, 00:30View analysis ↗ | W100 Cary WD | Kobori/Plipuech | 40% | 1.1-1.4 | 12.8-14.6 | 0.2 | 1.6 | 54.2% | 46.4% | – | 1.57 | ||
| Broadus/Rencheli | 80% | 1.8-0.4 | 11.5-7.1 | 0.7 | 2.8 | 68.8% | 57.7% | 2.25 | |||||
| 03/07, 02:00View analysis ↗ | UTR Pro Newport Beach | Liam Spiers | 30% | 0.8-1.6 | 10.2-12.3 | 1.9 | 3.8 | 61.5% | 37.9% | – | 5.50 | ||
| JP Day | 70% | 1.4-0.6 | 10.4-7 | 2.6 | 1.8 | 67.9% | 67.1% | 1.13 | |||||
| 03/07, 02:00View analysis ↗ | UTR Pro Newport Beach | Brayden Tallakson | 40% | 0.9-1.3 | 7.9-10.1 | 1.3 | 3.1 | 55.3% | 23% | – | 1.61 | ||
| Ilan Klein | 70% | 1.5-0.9 | 11.7-10.1 | 3.5 | 3.6 | 72% | 50.6% | 2.20 | |||||
| 03/07, 02:00View analysis ↗ | UTR Pro Newport Beach | Maciej Rajski | 100% | 2-0.2 | 12.5-6.4 | 2.6 | 2.3 | 72.9% | 65.6% | 1–0 | 1.07 | ||
| Noble Renfrow | 60% | 1.3-1 | 12.8-11.5 | 8 | 4.5 | 71.6% | 59.4% | 7.50 | |||||
| 03/07, 02:00View analysis ↗ | UTR Pro Newport Beach Women | Nicole Weng | 50% | 1.1-1.2 | 10.3-10.4 | 0.4 | 5.1 | 58% | 52.2% | – | 1.14 | ||
| Ares Teixido Garcia | 30% | 0.8-1.4 | 9.6-11.4 | 0.8 | 10.9 | 59.8% | 46.2% | 5.00 | |||||
| 03/07, 02:00View analysis ↗ | UTR Pro Newport Beach Women | Daniela Borruel | 80% | 1.6-0.6 | 11.4-6.7 | 0.6 | 2.6 | 61.2% | 57.8% | – | 1.08 | ||
| Paula Dougherty | 30% | 1-1.5 | 10.3-11.7 | 2.2 | 9.7 | 57.5% | 46.7% | 7.00 | |||||
| 03/07, 03:00View analysis ↗ | M15 Tokyo | Matthew Dellavedova | 80% | 1.7-0.3 | 10.5-6.5 | 1.5 | 1.3 | 69.5% | 49.4% | – | 1.28 | ||
| Koki Matsuda | 70% | 1.4-0.8 | 10.9-10 | 6.8 | 2.3 | 75.9% | 40.2% | 3.50 | |||||
| 03/07, 03:00View analysis ↗ | M15 Tokyo | Omar Jasika | 90% | 1.9-0.3 | 12.9-5.7 | 1.6 | 2.7 | 73.6% | 53.3% | – | 1.73 | ||
| Sanhui Shin | 90% | 1.8-0.4 | 12.2-7.1 | 2.2 | 1.4 | 72.6% | 60.2% | 2.00 | |||||
| 03/07, 03:30View analysis ↗ | UTR Pro Newport Beach | Christopher Rodi | 40% | 0.9-1.3 | 9.6-10.6 | 1 | 4.2 | 64.3% | 45.8% | – | 3.25 | ||
| Pavel Bushuev | 50% | 1.1-1.3 | 10.8-10.5 | 5.5 | 3.3 | 69.7% | 45% | 1.33 | |||||
| 03/07, 03:30View analysis ↗ | UTR Pro Newport Beach Women | Emily Deming | 50% | 1-1.2 | 9-9.8 | 0.7 | 5.9 | 59.3% | 51% | – | 1.17 | ||
| Alexandra Wolf | 50% | 1.2-1.2 | 10.7-10.6 | 0.6 | 3.7 | 58.3% | 52.9% | 4.50 | |||||
| 03/07, 03:30View analysis ↗ | UTR Pro Newport Beach Women | Lily Fairclough | 60% | 1.4-0.9 | 11.5-8.9 | 1.4 | 2 | 62.2% | 72.7% | – | 1.25 | ||
| Eduarda Piai | 50% | 1.4-1.2 | 12.2-11.2 | 1.3 | 5.5 | 61.8% | 45.4% | 3.75 | |||||
| 03/07, 04:00View analysis ↗ | M15 Wuning | Tianhui Zhang | 80% | 1.6-0.5 | 10.6-8.2 | 2 | 3.6 | 71.5% | 38.9% | 0–1 | 1.61 | ||
| Hanyi Liu | 80% | 1.7-0.4 | 10.7-6.6 | 1.7 | 1.9 | 72% | 54.5% | 2.20 | |||||
| 03/07, 04:00View analysis ↗ | W15 Maanshan | Anna Snigireva | 70% | 1.5-0.9 | 13.5-10.1 | 1.2 | 7.2 | 61.7% | 59.7% | 0–1 | 2.75 | ||
| Chenting Zhu | 70% | 1.4-0.7 | 11.4-8.5 | 2.4 | 3 | 67.9% | 53.7% | 1.40 | |||||
| 03/07, 04:00View analysis ↗ | W15 Maanshan | JiaYi Wang | 60% | 1.3-1 | 11-8.9 | 1.3 | 1.6 | 66.1% | 45.9% | 2–0 | 1.50 | ||
| Yuhan Wang | 60% | 1.3-0.8 | 9-7.3 | 0.9 | 4.4 | 65.5% | 53% | 2.50 | |||||
| 03/07, 04:00View analysis ↗ | W15 Maanshan | Shiyu Ye | 50% | 1.1-1.3 | 10.2-11.4 | 0.9 | 2.3 | 58.4% | 41.7% | 1–1 | 2.38 | ||
| Meiqi Guo | 60% | 1.5-0.8 | 11.1-8.7 | 2.3 | 2.8 | 68.5% | 49.1% | 1.53 | |||||
| 03/07, 09:30View analysis ↗ | Challenger Brasov | Sascha Gueymard Wayenburg | 40% | 0.9-1.4 | 10.9-12 | 6.9 | 4.6 | 68.9% | 35.9% | – | 2.38 | ||
| Maks Kasnikowski | 60% | 1.5-0.9 | 12.3-11 | 3.4 | 1.1 | 75.9% | 40.1% | 1.53 | |||||
| 03/07, 09:30View analysis ↗ | Challenger Brasov | Andrej Nedic | 80% | 1.7-0.5 | 12.8-8.1 | 1.9 | 1.3 | 67.4% | 56.6% | – | 1.33 | ||
| Keegan Smith | 60% | 1.5-1.1 | 14.8-12.9 | 8.1 | 1 | 74.8% | 41.4% | 3.25 | |||||
| 03/07, 10:00View analysis ↗ | Challenger Milan | Gustavo Heide | 80% | 1.6-0.6 | 11.7-8.8 | 7.7 | 5.4 | 74.1% | 48.8% | – | 1.44 | ||
| Enrico Dalla Valle | 70% | 1.5-0.6 | 11.3-7.5 | 4.3 | 1.4 | 74.2% | 51.3% | 2.63 | |||||
| 03/07, 10:00View analysis ↗ | Challenger Milan | Francisco Comesana | 70% | 1.9-1.1 | 16.8-14 | 6.8 | 3.7 | 78% | 39.7% | – | 1.33 | ||
| Daniel Rincon | 70% | 1.4-0.9 | 10.9-10.1 | 3 | 2.2 | 64.4% | 51.9% | 3.25 | |||||
| 03/07, 10:00View analysis ↗ | W35 Aix-les-Bains | Madison Sieg | 60% | 1.4-1 | 10.5-10.3 | 1.2 | 3.6 | 57.9% | 43.3% | – | 3.50 | ||
| Lisa Zaar | 70% | 1.6-0.7 | 12.2-9.2 | 0.1 | 1.7 | 58.7% | 50.9% | 1.28 | |||||
| 03/07, 10:00View analysis ↗ | W35 Aix-les-Bains | Alina Granwehr | 70% | 1.5-0.8 | 11.9-9.8 | 2.4 | 4.8 | 65.7% | 53.3% | – | 1.73 | ||
| Carlota Martinez Cirez | 60% | 1.3-1 | 11.3-9.9 | 0 | 3 | 57.8% | 58% | 2.00 | |||||
| 03/07, 10:30View analysis ↗ | Challenger Troyes | Lorenzo Giustino | 30% | 0.9-1.6 | 11.3-13.2 | 7.6 | 4.8 | 65.1% | 50.5% | – | 1.83 | ||
| Igor Marcondes | 60% | 1.5-1.2 | 14-12.4 | 4.1 | 2.8 | 69.4% | 32.8% | 1.83 | |||||
| 03/07, 10:30View analysis ↗ | Challenger Troyes | Marvin Moeller | 70% | 1.5-0.7 | 12.3-8.9 | 2.1 | 2 | 68% | 47.4% | 0–1 | 2.20 | ||
| Marat Sharipov | 60% | 1.4-0.9 | 12-9.8 | 5.7 | 2.7 | 72.4% | 42.9% | 1.61 | |||||
| 03/07, 12:00View analysis ↗ | Wimbledon WD | Errani/Paolini | 60% | 1.3-0.8 | 11.1-10 | 0.3 | 0.8 | 61.6% | 45% | – | 1.20 | ||
| Kozyreva/Shymanovich | 40% | 1.2-1.5 | 15.3-16.7 | 1 | 1.8 | 59.4% | 36.2% | 4.33 | |||||
| 03/07, 12:00View analysis ↗ | Wimbledon Women | Daria Kasatkina | 50% | 1.2-1.2 | 11.5-11.6 | 1.9 | 6 | 60.5% | 56% | 0–3 | 4.33 | ||
| Naomi Osaka | 90% | 1.8-0.3 | 12.6-8.1 | 6.1 | 2 | 77.1% | 51.7% | 1.22 | |||||
| 03/07, 12:00View analysis ↗ | Wimbledon | Hubert Hurkacz | 50% | 1.8-1.3 | 17-15.6 | 15.6 | 3.2 | 76.7% | 40.8% | 1–3 | 2.20 | ||
| Tommy Paul | 80% | 2.3-0.6 | 17.1-12.2 | 9.8 | 2.2 | 77.5% | 50.2% | 1.67 | |||||
| 03/07, 12:00View analysis ↗ | Wimbledon | Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 80% | 1.9-0.5 | 13.6-10.3 | 5 | 1.1 | 74.7% | 40.1% | 1–1 | 1.30 | ||
| Marton Fucsovics | 30% | 0.9-1.7 | 12.2-15.1 | 5 | 5.1 | 70.9% | 23% | 3.50 | |||||
| 03/07, 12:00View analysis ↗ | Wimbledon | Jannik Sinner | 90% | 2.3-0.6 | 16.2-11 | 9 | 2.3 | 78.6% | 47.2% | 1–0 | 1.03 | ||
| Jenson Brooksby | 40% | 1.1-1.4 | 11.5-12 | 3.4 | 0.6 | 65.5% | 39% | 15.00 | |||||
| 03/07, 12:00View analysis ↗ | Wimbledon Women | Karolina Muchova | 80% | 1.6-0.5 | 11.3-7.3 | 4.7 | 2.5 | 75.6% | 62.7% | – | 1.07 | ||
| Mananchaya Sawangkaew | 80% | 1.6-0.8 | 12.3-10.7 | 2.6 | 4.2 | 62.8% | 50.2% | 9.00 | |||||
| 03/07, 12:00View analysis ↗ | Wimbledon Women | Aryna Sabalenka | 80% | 1.8-0.5 | 12.5-9.6 | 5.1 | 2.7 | 71.3% | 57.9% | 3–1 | 1.20 | ||
| Jelena Ostapenko | 80% | 1.7-0.7 | 12.3-8.3 | 5.3 | 6.3 | 75.4% | 51.3% | 4.50 | |||||
| 03/07, 12:00View analysis ↗ | Wimbledon Women | Claire Liu | 80% | 1.7-0.6 | 12.7-7.8 | 8.6 | 1.5 | 68.1% | 65.2% | 0–1 | 7.00 | ||
| Coco Gauff | 70% | 1.7-0.9 | 13.8-10.8 | 3.3 | 3.8 | 69.8% | 46% | 1.10 | |||||
| 03/07, 12:00View analysis ↗ | Wimbledon Women | Jessica Pegula | 70% | 1.6-0.7 | 12.3-9.3 | 4.7 | 1.2 | 70.3% | 43.3% | 1–0 | 1.08 | ||
| Jessica Bouzas Maneiro | 50% | 1-1.2 | 9.6-10.3 | 1.3 | 2.6 | 60.7% | 43% | 8.00 | |||||
| 03/07, 12:00View analysis ↗ | Wimbledon Women | Nikola Bartunkova | 70% | 1.7-0.9 | 15.1-12.6 | 5.8 | 5.1 | 73.7% | 41% | – | 2.75 | ||
| Barbora Krejcikova | 70% | 1.5-0.8 | 12.2-9.7 | 5.2 | 3 | 72.6% | 35.5% | 1.44 | |||||
| 03/07, 12:00View analysis ↗ | Wimbledon Women | Ekaterina Alexandrova | 40% | 1-1.3 | 10.9-11.5 | 4.3 | 4.8 | 66.6% | 36.7% | 1–0 | 2.63 | ||
| Iva Jovic | 70% | 1.6-0.7 | 12-8.7 | 2.1 | 3.3 | 70.5% | 50.5% | 1.50 | |||||
| 03/07, 12:00View analysis ↗ | Wimbledon Women | Belinda Bencic | 70% | 1.6-0.6 | 11.4-8.2 | 2 | 2.8 | 69.9% | 48.1% | 3–1 | 1.40 | ||
| Anna Kalinskaya | 70% | 1.4-0.9 | 11.2-11 | 2.7 | 4.7 | 63.8% | 47.3% | 3.00 | |||||
| 03/07, 12:00View analysis ↗ | Wimbledon | Roman Safiullin | 70% | 2-1.3 | 18.5-16.9 | 8.9 | 3.4 | 78.3% | 51.4% | – | 3.20 | ||
| Joao Fonseca | 60% | 2-1.4 | 18-16.2 | 6.5 | 1.6 | 67.1% | 39.2% | 1.36 | |||||
| 03/07, 12:00View analysis ↗ | Wimbledon | Felix Auger Aliassime | 70% | 2-1 | 16.9-13.8 | 13.7 | 2.5 | 80.1% | 45.5% | – | 1.17 | ||
| Michael Zheng | 70% | 1.9-1.1 | 17-14.4 | 11.8 | 3 | 73.8% | 53.5% | 5.00 | |||||
| 03/07, 12:00View analysis ↗ | Wimbledon | Arthur Rinderknech | 50% | 1.6-1.3 | 15.9-15.3 | 15.9 | 3.7 | 80.9% | 19.7% | – | 6.00 | ||
| Novak Djokovic | 60% | 2.1-1.5 | 18.7-16.3 | 7.6 | 2.8 | 74.3% | 44.3% | 1.13 | |||||
| 03/07, 12:00View analysis ↗ | Wimbledon MD | Arevalo/Pavic | 80% | 1.7-0.5 | 12.8-9 | 4.5 | 1.3 | 78.2% | 43.1% | – | 1.28 | ||
| Stevenson/Willis | 80% | 1.7-0.8 | 15.8-15.3 | 7.2 | 4.9 | 81.6% | 25.3% | 3.50 | |||||
| 03/07, 13:30View analysis ↗ | Wimbledon WD | Kichenok/Ninomiya | 30% | 0.7-1.6 | 10.4-12.7 | 0.6 | 2.3 | 59.5% | 46.1% | – | 3.00 | ||
| Muhammad/Stollar | 50% | 1.2-1.4 | 13.9-14.1 | 3 | 2.1 | 69.3% | 38.8% | 1.36 | |||||
| 03/07, 16:00View analysis ↗ | Challenger Quito | Alan Magadan | 90% | 1.9-0.5 | 13.5-8 | 4.1 | 2.8 | 78.6% | 48.4% | – | 3.25 | ||
| Matheus Pucinelli De Almeida | 70% | 1.5-0.8 | 12.6-8.7 | 2.2 | 2.8 | 70.5% | 51.1% | 1.33 | |||||
| 03/07, 16:00View analysis ↗ | Challenger Quito | Hernan Casanova | 60% | 1.4-0.8 | 10.9-8.9 | 0.4 | 0.7 | 59.9% | 49.1% | – | 1.28 | ||
| Juan Sebastian Osorio | 90% | 1.7-0.8 | 14.3-11 | 6.6 | 2.8 | 72.5% | 41.7% | 3.50 | |||||
| 03/07, 16:00View analysis ↗ | Challenger Cary | Edward Winter | 50% | 1.3-1.3 | 12.9-12.1 | 3.1 | 3.1 | 68.4% | 27.1% | – | 1.28 | ||
| William Manning | 50% | 1-1.2 | 11-10.3 | 7.4 | 4.6 | 77.7% | 49.4% | 3.50 | |||||
| 03/07, 16:00View analysis ↗ | Challenger Cary | Jack Kennedy | 80% | 1.7-0.9 | 13.9-13.2 | 2.4 | 3.5 | 57.7% | 58.1% | – | 3.25 | ||
| Yosuke Watanuki | 50% | 1.2-1.2 | 12-10.9 | 9 | 3.4 | 70.5% | 46.1% | 1.33 |
Frequently asked questions
What is surface Elo?
A rating computed separately for clay, hard, grass and carpet: a player can be much stronger on one surface than another.
What do aces and double faults measure?
Aces are winning serves (serve power); double faults are two serve misses in a row (consistency). Both help estimate games and sets.
How does BetsTalent calculate probabilities?
With an in-house model: opponent-adjusted Elo and, in football, Poisson/Dixon-Coles with per-team attack and defence. In tennis, Elo by surface. No raw averages.

