Tennis stats
The tool for those who build their own bet. Filter and find your value.
Filter by win rate, aces, double faults, service games and break points per player and surface. Build your read of the match with real data. How our model works → Total games in tennis: what actually predicts it (and what doesn't) →
Filters are Premium: date, league, search, ranges and favourites. The full table, sorting and every match analysis stay free. Go Premium →
Click a column to sort; click again to reverse. · Swipe the table sideways →
| ⓘ | Date | Tournament | Players | Surface ⓘ | Form ⓘ | Win % ⓘ | Win % surf. ⓘ | Sets ⓘ | Games ⓘ | Games line ⓘ | Aces ⓘ | Double faults ⓘ | 1st serve % ⓘ | Break % ⓘ | H2H ⓘ | Odds ⓘ |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25/09, 14:00View analysis ↗ | ATP Hangzhou MD | Reynolds/Watt | Hard Bo3 | 60% | 60% (10) | 1.5-0.9 | 14.6-13.1 | – | 3 | 2.1 | 78.5% | 24.1% | 2–0 | 1.91 | ||
| Gille/Verbeek | 40% | 33% (3) | 1-1.3 | 13.6-14.4 | 2.4 | 2.1 | 76.6% | 48.9% | 1.80 | |||||||
| 25/09, 14:00View analysis ↗ | WTA Porto | Elena Malygina | Hard Bo3 | 70% | 83% (6) | 1.5-1 | 12.6-11.1 | – | 1.9 | 3.5 | 60.5% | 55.7% | 0–1 | 4.00 | ||
| Sinja Kraus | 50% | 50% (8) | 1.2-1.1 | 11-11.3 | 1.9 | 3 | 57.7% | 44.6% | 1.22 | |||||||
| 25/09, 14:00View analysis ↗ | WTA Tolentino | Mia Ristic | Clay Bo3 | 70% | 71% (7) | 1.4-0.9 | 11-9.7 | – | 1.8 | 0.7 | 62.7% | 39.8% | 1–0 | 1.13 | ||
| Jessica Pieri | 60% | 67% (9) | 1.2-1 | 10.5-9.1 | 0.4 | 3.2 | 61.6% | 50.2% | 5.50 | |||||||
| 25/09, 14:00View analysis ↗ | Laver Cup | Casper Ruud | Hard Bo3 | 60% | 50% (2) | 1.6-1.3 | 15.7-13.5 | o 1.83 L 20.5 u 1.83 |
6.4 | 3.8 | 74.5% | 47.7% | 4–5 | 1.83 | ||
| Francisco Cerundolo | 50% | 43% (7) | 1.5-1.6 | 14.9-14.7 | 6.2 | 4.5 | 73.9% | 32.3% | 1.83 | |||||||
| 25/09, 14:00View analysis ↗ | WTA Porto | Reese Brantmeier | Hard Bo3 | 60% | 71% (7) | 1.4-0.9 | 11.7-9.8 | – | 4.5 | 1.7 | 69.4% | 43.9% | – | 1.36 | ||
| Angelina Voloshchuk | 80% | 86% (7) | 1.6-0.6 | 11.7-7.7 | 0.4 | 4.4 | 64.4% | 58.2% | 3.00 | |||||||
| 25/09, 14:00View analysis ↗ | WTA Singapore | Maria Sakkari | Hard Bo3 | 60% | 60% (10) | 1.4-1 | 11.8-10 | o 1.83 L 21.5 u 1.83 |
5 | 3.2 | 68.3% | 46.6% | – | 1.44 | ||
| Talia Gibson | 40% | 44% (9) | 1.2-1.3 | 11.4-12.8 | 4.4 | 6.8 | 66.9% | 39.8% | 2.75 | |||||||
| 25/09, 14:00View analysis ↗ | W50 Yecla | Charo Esquiva Banuls | Clay Bo3 | 60% | 0% (1) | 1.3-0.9 | 10.6-9.3 | – | 1.8 | 3.5 | 56.3% | 48% | – | 1.67 | ||
| Tiphanie Lemaitre | 40% | – | 0.9-1.2 | 10.3-10.1 | 2.1 | 2.8 | 63.7% | 47.3% | 2.10 | |||||||
| 25/09, 14:30View analysis ↗ | Challenger Saint-Tropez | Dino Prizmic | Hard Bo3 | 50% | 50% (6) | 1.3-1.4 | 13-13.1 | – | 4.1 | 3.8 | 73.8% | 40.2% | – | 1.20 | ||
| Daniil Glinka | 60% | 60% (10) | 1.4-0.9 | 11.9-10.8 | 5.4 | 3.1 | 72.3% | 60.3% | 4.33 | |||||||
| 25/09, 15:00View analysis ↗ | Challenger Genoa | Mika Petkovic | Clay Bo3 | 40% | 44% (9) | 1-1.4 | 11.9-12.6 | – | 1.7 | 3.6 | 67.4% | 29% | – | 2.00 | ||
| Francesco Forti | 60% | 67% (9) | 1.2-0.8 | 10.1-8.1 | 3.3 | 2.1 | 67.5% | 34.1% | 1.73 | |||||||
| 25/09, 15:30View analysis ↗ | WTA Porto | Maria Timofeeva | Hard Bo3 | 70% | 70% (10) | 1.4-0.8 | 10.6-9.8 | – | 1.9 | 3.8 | 63.3% | 49.3% | – | 1.36 | ||
| Gabriela Knutson | 80% | 80% (10) | 1.6-0.7 | 12.1-9.7 | 3.4 | 4.3 | 66% | 49.1% | 3.00 | |||||||
| 25/09, 15:30View analysis ↗ | Laver Cup | Jakub Mensik | Hard Bo3 | 60% | 63% (8) | 1.7-1.2 | 14.6-13.7 | o 2.00 L 21.5 u 1.72 |
12 | 4.3 | 77.9% | 36.8% | 2–1 | 1.73 | ||
| Brandon Nakashima | 70% | 70% (10) | 1.5-1 | 13.8-11.1 | 11.7 | 1.8 | 79.2% | 34.7% | 2.00 | |||||||
| 25/09, 15:30View analysis ↗ | WTA Ankara | Deniz Dilek | Hard Bo3 | 70% | 67% (6) | 1.6-0.8 | 11.6-8.8 | – | 3.1 | 5.5 | 65.7% | 53.5% | – | 5.50 | ||
| Anastasia Gasanova | 70% | 67% (3) | 1.5-0.6 | 11.1-6.9 | 0.8 | 5.3 | 67.3% | 55.8% | 1.13 | |||||||
| 25/09, 15:30View analysis ↗ | UTR Pro College Station | Andreas Scott | Hard Bo3 | 20% | 22% (9) | 0.7-1.7 | 10.2-11.7 | – | 2.3 | 3.8 | 66.1% | 42.8% | – | 3.75 | ||
| Lathan Skrobarcek | 80% | 80% (10) | 1.7-0.5 | 12.2-7.8 | 4 | 4.6 | 73.9% | 57.6% | 1.25 | |||||||
| 25/09, 16:00View analysis ↗ | M15 Forbach | Flynn Thomas | Hard Bo3 | 50% | – | 1.1-1.1 | 9-8.5 | – | 1.2 | 5.4 | 67.3% | 46.3% | – | 1.40 | ||
| Theo Herrmann | 60% | 40% (5) | 1.2-0.8 | 9.7-8.1 | 4.5 | 3.9 | 75.3% | 31.6% | 2.75 | |||||||
| 25/09, 16:00View analysis ↗ | M25 Sabadell | Ivan Gakhov | Clay Bo3 | 70% | 67% (6) | 1.6-0.9 | 12.5-10.6 | – | 3.6 | 3.4 | 69.6% | 51.6% | 0–1 | 1.57 | ||
| Ignacio Parisca Romera | 70% | 83% (6) | 1.4-0.8 | 11-9.3 | 1.4 | 4 | 68.6% | 58.2% | 2.25 | |||||||
| 25/09, 17:00View analysis ↗ | M25 Falun | Eero Vasa | – Bo3 | 70% | – | 1.2-0.7 | 10.4-8.1 | – | 6.2 | 2.8 | 78.2% | 33.1% | – | 3.25 | ||
| Samir Banerjee | 80% | – | 1.6-0.7 | 12.7-9 | 4.3 | 2.5 | 76.9% | 44.8% | 1.33 | |||||||
| 25/09, 17:00View analysis ↗ | WTA Porto WD | Jorge/Jorge | Hard Bo3 | 80% | 80% (5) | 1.6-0.6 | 13.3-7.9 | – | 1.1 | 1.7 | 69.5% | 62% | – | 1.33 | ||
| Corley/Corley | 40% | 50% (6) | 1.3-1.2 | 13.1-13.2 | 1.1 | 4.1 | 61.9% | 54.2% | 3.25 | |||||||
| 25/09, 17:00View analysis ↗ | M15 Curitiba | Juan Sebastian Osorio | – Bo3 | 70% | – | 1.6-0.9 | 12.6-10.4 | – | 3.9 | 2.8 | 72.7% | 49% | 1–0 | 3.50 | ||
| Pedro Sakamoto | 80% | – | 1.7-0.6 | 12.6-8.2 | 2.2 | 1.3 | 73.7% | 65.3% | 1.28 | |||||||
| 25/09, 17:00View analysis ↗ | Challenger Buenos Aires | Pedro Boscardin Dias | Clay Bo3 | 20% | 22% (9) | 0.7-1.7 | 9.4-12.7 | – | 1.4 | 1.9 | 61.7% | 57.9% | 2–5 | 1.73 | ||
| Eduardo Ribeiro | 50% | 50% (10) | 1.2-1.1 | 11.6-11.9 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 66.6% | 38.4% | 2.00 | |||||||
| 25/09, 17:00View analysis ↗ | UTR Pro College Station | Ritesh Patil | Hard Bo3 | 40% | 40% (10) | 1.1-1.3 | 12.3-11.1 | – | 3.8 | 2.9 | 74.6% | 24.7% | – | 1.40 | ||
| Marshall Landry | 50% | 50% (10) | 1.2-1 | 10.4-9.7 | 2.4 | 2.5 | 61.7% | 55.7% | 2.75 | |||||||
| 25/09, 17:30View analysis ↗ | Challenger Saint-Tropez | Titouan Droguet | Hard Bo3 | 90% | 90% (10) | 1.9-0.8 | 15.4-12.4 | – | 9.4 | 2.7 | 74.6% | 40.3% | 1–0 | 1.83 | ||
| Mark Lajal | 80% | 80% (10) | 1.6-0.6 | 13.1-9 | 5.4 | 3.1 | 74.7% | 53.1% | 1.83 | |||||||
| 25/09, 17:30View analysis ↗ | W50 Yecla | Kira Pavlova | Clay Bo3 | 80% | – | 1.7-0.6 | 12.5-8.4 | – | 0.8 | 5.4 | 66.7% | 54.2% | – | 1.67 | ||
| Angela Fita Boluda | 60% | 0% (2) | 1.2-1 | 11.6-11.4 | 2.9 | 4 | 64.4% | 43.2% | 2.10 | |||||||
| 25/09, 17:30View analysis ↗ | WTA Tolentino | Ekaterine Gorgodze | Hard Bo3 | 70% | 67% (3) | 1.4-1 | 12.5-12.4 | – | 0.9 | 1 | 56.5% | 47.9% | 1–0 | 2.63 | ||
| Oksana Selekhmeteva | 60% | 57% (7) | 1.3-1.3 | 12.5-12.6 | 0.9 | 9.4 | 62.1% | 40.2% | 1.44 | |||||||
| 25/09, 18:00View analysis ↗ | Challenger Genoa | Jay Clarke | Clay Bo3 | 80% | 80% (10) | 1.8-0.8 | 13.7-10.8 | – | 2.8 | 2 | 66.3% | 47.6% | – | 1.83 | ||
| Carlo Alberto Caniato | 80% | 80% (10) | 1.7-0.6 | 13-9.6 | 5.6 | 2.1 | 76.3% | 34.3% | 1.83 | |||||||
| 25/09, 18:00View analysis ↗ | M15 Columbia | Charlie Swaine | Clay Bo3 | 60% | 50% (6) | 1.3-0.9 | 10.6-9.4 | – | 2.5 | 2.5 | 70% | 49% | – | 7.50 | ||
| Oliver Bonding | 60% | – | 1.4-0.9 | 12.1-9.9 | 2 | 3.8 | 68.5% | 52.3% | 1.07 | |||||||
| 25/09, 18:00View analysis ↗ | M15 Columbia | Evan Bynoe | Hard Bo3 | 70% | 0% (1) | 1.5-1 | 12.7-12 | – | 3.8 | 4.2 | 69.1% | 35.7% | – | 3.40 | ||
| William Jansen | 70% | – | 1.5-0.8 | 12.9-9.5 | 6.7 | 1.3 | 79.8% | 40.1% | 1.30 | |||||||
| 25/09, 18:00View analysis ↗ | M15 Columbia | Sean Daryabeigi | Hard Bo3 | 60% | 56% (9) | 1.4-0.8 | 11.2-7.5 | – | 3.9 | 2.9 | 75% | 51.1% | – | 1.57 | ||
| Tito Chavez | 60% | 0% (1) | 1.3-0.9 | 10-9.2 | 0.9 | 2.8 | 62.5% | 53.5% | 2.25 | |||||||
| 25/09, 18:00View analysis ↗ | M15 Columbia | Gabe Avram | Hard Bo3 | 70% | 63% (8) | 1.6-0.7 | 13-10.4 | – | 2.1 | 2.3 | 64.1% | 52.7% | – | 2.20 | ||
| Antonin Witz | 50% | – | 1.1-1.1 | 9.6-8.6 | 1 | 5.5 | 62% | 53.5% | 1.61 | |||||||
| 25/09, 18:30View analysis ↗ | Challenger Buenos Aires | Facundo Mena | Clay Bo3 | 90% | 90% (10) | 1.8-0.5 | 12.2-9.5 | – | 4.9 | 2.8 | 70.5% | 40% | 3–3 | 1.61 | ||
| Nicolas Kicker | 70% | 70% (10) | 1.5-0.9 | 11.3-9.4 | 1.9 | 2.8 | 62.6% | 52.6% | 2.20 | |||||||
| 25/09, 18:30View analysis ↗ | M25 Falun MD | Brostrom Poulsen/Slavic | Clay Bo3 | 90% | 83% (6) | 1.8-0.2 | 12-7.7 | – | 4.6 | 1.2 | 83.2% | 40% | – | 1.36 | ||
| Vasa/Vasa | 60% | 40% (5) | 1.5-0.8 | 12.1-9 | 2.7 | 2.8 | 77.8% | 39.7% | 3.00 | |||||||
| 25/09, 18:30View analysis ↗ | M15 Curitiba | Mateus Alves | Clay Bo3 | 90% | – | 1.8-0.2 | 12-5.1 | – | 6.1 | 1.1 | 79.6% | 53.7% | – | 1.07 | ||
| Joao Victor Couto Loureiro | 50% | 33% (3) | 1.4-1.3 | 13.6-11.9 | 3.7 | 2.4 | 66.2% | 46.1% | 7.50 | |||||||
| 25/09, 18:30View analysis ↗ | UTR Pro College Station Women | Emily Welker | Hard Bo3 | 100% | 100% (3) | 2-0.1 | 12.6-4.5 | – | 1.3 | 1.3 | 53.7% | 73.3% | – | 1.25 | ||
| Sydney Jara | 60% | 71% (7) | 1.4-0.8 | 11.4-7.9 | 0.4 | 1.4 | 64.6% | 54% | 3.75 | |||||||
| 25/09, 18:30View analysis ↗ | M15 Curitiba | Nicolas Zanellato | – Bo3 | 80% | – | 1.6-0.6 | 11.7-8.5 | – | 1.7 | 1.8 | 70.6% | 40.7% | 2–1 | 2.20 | ||
| Joao Eduardo Schiessl | 70% | – | 1.4-0.9 | 11.2-8.9 | 2.2 | 1.5 | 68.9% | 53.5% | 1.61 | |||||||
| 25/09, 18:30View analysis ↗ | UTR Pro Norfolk | Piet Steveker | Clay Bo3 | 80% | 80% (10) | 1.6-0.7 | 11.4-7.6 | – | 1.6 | 2.8 | 60.4% | 62.8% | – | 1.10 | ||
| James Weber | 20% | 0% (3) | 0.4-1.6 | 6.8-11.5 | 1.4 | 2.9 | 58.9% | 30.4% | 6.50 | |||||||
| 25/09, 18:30View analysis ↗ | UTR Pro Norfolk | Cooper Johnson | Hard Bo3 | 40% | 57% (7) | 1.3-1.4 | 11.5-11.6 | – | 4 | 2.1 | 64.7% | 42.2% | – | 1.61 | ||
| Drew Hedgecoe | 40% | 43% (7) | 1-1.3 | 9.5-11.2 | 2.3 | 2 | 60.7% | 73.3% | 2.20 | |||||||
| 25/09, 18:30View analysis ↗ | UTR Pro Norfolk | Ilan Hediger | Hard Bo3 | 10% | 0% (5) | 0.5-1.8 | 8-11.4 | – | 0.7 | 0.9 | 55.6% | 59.9% | – | 1.73 | ||
| Noble Renfrow | 20% | 29% (7) | 0.5-1.6 | 7.6-11.3 | 4.9 | 3.4 | 63.8% | 31.4% | 2.00 | |||||||
| 25/09, 19:00View analysis ↗ | W50 Berkeley | Hanna Chang | Clay Bo3 | 70% | – | 1.3-0.8 | 9.8-8.2 | – | 2 | 5 | 66.4% | 52.9% | – | 2.38 | ||
| Janae Preston | 60% | 67% (3) | 1.4-1 | 12.1-9.9 | 0.7 | 2.6 | 60.9% | 52.1% | 1.53 | |||||||
| 25/09, 19:30View analysis ↗ | WTA Tolentino | Nuria Brancaccio | Hard Bo3 | 50% | 0% (1) | 1.1-1.3 | 11.3-11.4 | – | 1.8 | 2.7 | 57.6% | 46.6% | 1–2 | 2.20 | ||
| Julia Grabher | 60% | 50% (6) | 1.3-1.1 | 11.1-11.7 | 2 | 5.6 | 63.3% | 51.1% | 1.61 | |||||||
| 25/09, 20:00View analysis ↗ | Challenger Buenos Aires | Joaquin Aguillar Cardozo | Clay Bo3 | 100% | 100% (5) | 2-0.2 | 13.3-6.9 | – | 0.7 | 1.4 | 66.7% | 55.7% | – | 1.57 | ||
| Juan Pablo Varillas | 80% | 75% (8) | 1.6-0.9 | 14.1-11.3 | 4.3 | 0.6 | 72.8% | 44.1% | 2.25 | |||||||
| 25/09, 20:00View analysis ↗ | Laver Cup | Rafael Jodar | Hard Bo3 | 70% | 67% (9) | 1.5-0.9 | 12.4-10.1 | o 1.90 L 20.5 u 1.80 |
3 | 2.9 | 71% | 40.9% | – | 1.50 | ||
| Alexander Bublik | 60% | 67% (3) | 1.8-1.3 | 16.6-14.3 | 15.8 | 4.8 | 79.3% | 31.5% | 2.50 | |||||||
| 25/09, 20:00View analysis ↗ | W15 Belem | Jennifer Rosa Dourado | Hard Bo3 | 60% | – | 1.3-0.9 | 11.2-9.9 | – | 1.2 | 1.7 | 63% | 51.5% | 0–1 | 7.50 | ||
| Josefina Estevez | 70% | 0% (1) | 1.4-0.7 | 10.6-7.2 | 0.4 | 4.8 | 62.2% | 61.9% | 1.07 | |||||||
| 25/09, 20:00View analysis ↗ | W15 Belem | Leticia Garcia Vidal | – Bo3 | 50% | – | 1-1.2 | 9.6-8.4 | – | 0.5 | 6.5 | 64.5% | 52% | 0–3 | 2.10 | ||
| Julia Konishi Camargo Silva | 60% | – | 1.2-0.9 | 9.1-8.4 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 58.8% | 53.7% | 1.67 | |||||||
| 25/09, 20:00View analysis ↗ | UTR Pro College Station Women | Rachael Smith | Hard Bo3 | 60% | 50% (2) | 1.2-1 | 8.8-8.2 | – | 1.1 | 3.9 | 62.4% | 42.5% | – | 2.50 | ||
| Ruby Cooling | 30% | 20% (5) | 0.7-1.4 | 7.8-10.1 | 1.1 | 5.8 | 61.1% | 38.5% | 1.50 | |||||||
| 25/09, 21:00View analysis ↗ | Challenger San Diego | Igor Marcondes | Hard Bo3 | 70% | 60% (5) | 1.4-1 | 11.9-10.6 | – | 5.9 | 2.2 | 69.3% | 40.2% | – | 2.25 | ||
| Federico Agustin Gomez | 60% | 60% (5) | 1.2-1 | 10.5-10.8 | 3.8 | 3.6 | 69.6% | 45.1% | 1.57 | |||||||
| 25/09, 21:30View analysis ↗ | Challenger Buenos Aires | Juan Carlos Prado Angelo | Clay Bo3 | 50% | 50% (6) | 1.3-1.2 | 11.6-12.1 | – | 0.6 | 1.4 | 62.1% | 53.4% | – | 1.73 | ||
| Alex Barrena | 80% | 80% (10) | 1.6-0.8 | 12.5-10 | 1.8 | 1.5 | 65.3% | 44.8% | 2.00 | |||||||
| 25/09, 22:00View analysis ↗ | W50 Berkeley | Kayla Day | Hard Bo3 | 60% | 50% (8) | 1.4-0.9 | 11.6-9.6 | – | 6.2 | 4 | 71.3% | 45.2% | 1–0 | 1.06 | ||
| Anna Rogers | 60% | 50% (2) | 1.3-1.1 | 10.8-10.1 | 1.8 | 2.1 | 59.6% | 58.6% | 8.00 | |||||||
| 25/09, 23:00View analysis ↗ | Challenger San Diego | Tristan Boyer | Hard Bo3 | 50% | 50% (10) | 1.2-1.1 | 10.9-10.8 | – | 3.6 | 1.9 | 69.6% | 34.6% | – | 1.83 | ||
| Timo Legout | 80% | 80% (10) | 1.7-0.5 | 12.2-7.6 | 0.5 | 2.3 | 66.8% | 60% | 1.83 | |||||||
| 26/09, 01:00View analysis ↗ | Challenger San Diego | Dylan Dietrich | Hard Bo3 | 70% | 100% (2) | 1.6-0.7 | 13-10 | – | 9.6 | 3.1 | 82.1% | 34.3% | – | 1.67 | ||
| Henry Searle | 60% | 33% (6) | 1.3-1 | 11.3-11 | 5.7 | 2.9 | 72.4% | 38.9% | 2.10 | |||||||
| 26/09, 02:30View analysis ↗ | Challenger San Diego | Nishesh Basavareddy | Hard Bo3 | 60% | 67% (9) | 1.5-1.2 | 13.7-11.7 | – | 5.8 | 4.6 | 69.6% | 49% | 1–0 | 1.33 | ||
| Andy Andrade | 70% | 78% (9) | 1.6-0.9 | 12.8-11.2 | 2.4 | 3.9 | 72.9% | 42.3% | 3.25 | |||||||
| 26/09, 03:00View analysis ↗ | W50 Nanao | Sayaka Ishii | Hard Bo3 | 70% | 50% (2) | 1.6-0.8 | 13.4-10.5 | – | 2.6 | 6.2 | 69.1% | 61.9% | 0–1 | 3.00 | ||
| Hiromi Abe | 90% | – | 1.9-0.6 | 13.3-7.7 | 0.6 | 1.5 | 65.8% | 54.2% | 1.36 | |||||||
| 26/09, 04:00View analysis ↗ | WTA Seoul | Anna Bondar | Hard Bo3 | 60% | 60% (10) | 1.4-1.1 | 13.3-11.6 | – | 3.3 | 4.5 | 67.2% | 48.2% | 0–2 | 2.50 | ||
| Elena-Gabriela Ruse | 50% | 67% (6) | 1-1.1 | 9.5-9.1 | 3.3 | 4.6 | 66% | 39.9% | 1.53 | |||||||
| 26/09, 04:00View analysis ↗ | W15 Maanshan | Zijun Jiang | Hard Bo3 | 60% | 60% (10) | 1.4-0.9 | 10-8.8 | – | 1.4 | 3.6 | 67.8% | 57% | – | 5.50 | ||
| Anna Kubareva | 60% | 100% (3) | 1.4-0.9 | 10.9-8.6 | 1.1 | 3.6 | 63% | 56.7% | 1.13 | |||||||
| 26/09, 04:00View analysis ↗ | M25 Yinchuan | Alibek Kachmazov | Hard Bo3 | 90% | 50% (2) | 1.9-0.3 | 13.4-8 | – | 9.6 | 2.6 | 79.4% | 54.1% | – | 1.17 | ||
| Mukund Sasikumar | 60% | 40% (5) | 1.6-0.9 | 13.6-10.8 | 6.5 | 1.5 | 73.9% | 45.8% | 4.50 | |||||||
| 26/09, 04:00View analysis ↗ | WTA Jingshan | Kristiana Sidorova | Hard Bo3 | 80% | – | 1.7-0.7 | 12.8-10.6 | – | 4.6 | 4.3 | 75.6% | 52% | 1–0 | 1.10 | ||
| Aruzhan Sagandikova | 50% | 50% (2) | 1.1-1.2 | 9.3-10.9 | 2.2 | 2.6 | 60.1% | 41.6% | 6.50 | |||||||
| 26/09, 04:30View analysis ↗ | W50 Nanao | Sakura Hosogi | Clay Bo3 | 40% | 0% (2) | 1-1.6 | 10.9-13.5 | – | 0.6 | 1.3 | 54.9% | 38.9% | 0–1 | 1.11 | ||
| Michika Ozeki | 30% | – | 1.1-1.6 | 11.3-13.9 | 1.3 | 3.3 | 55.5% | 46.4% | 6.00 | |||||||
| 26/09, 05:00View analysis ↗ | WTA Seoul | Lanlana Tararudee | Hard Bo3 | 60% | 60% (10) | 1.3-1 | 12.2-10.8 | – | 4.1 | 5 | 71.7% | 44.4% | 1–0 | 1.67 | ||
| Maya Joint | 60% | 60% (10) | 1.5-1.1 | 12.5-11.4 | 1.7 | 4.1 | 61% | 59.4% | 2.20 | |||||||
| 26/09, 05:30View analysis ↗ | WTA Seoul | Taylah Preston | Hard Bo3 | 70% | 70% (10) | 1.5-0.8 | 11.1-9.8 | – | 1.8 | 5.7 | 64.9% | 42.8% | – | 3.40 | ||
| Alina Korneeva | 70% | 70% (10) | 1.4-0.8 | 10.9-8.9 | 2 | 3.1 | 65.4% | 64.2% | 1.33 | |||||||
| 26/09, 06:00View analysis ↗ | W50 Nanao WD | Abe/Yamazaki | Hard Bo3 | 90% | 86% (7) | 1.7-0.4 | 11.6-7.3 | – | 0.3 | 2.1 | 68.7% | 47.9% | – | 1.61 | ||
| Miyamoto/Yoshioka | 70% | 60% (5) | 1.6-0.7 | 10.7-6.9 | 0.4 | 2.3 | 63.7% | 48.7% | 2.20 | |||||||
| 26/09, 06:30View analysis ↗ | M25 Yinchuan | Kuan-Shou Chen | Hard Bo3 | 90% | 86% (7) | 1.8-0.4 | 12.5-8 | – | 0.3 | 1.7 | 66.8% | 56.5% | – | 1.83 | ||
| Alexandr Binda | 80% | 71% (7) | 1.6-0.7 | 12.6-10.6 | 7.4 | 3.8 | 75.2% | 36.7% | 1.83 | |||||||
| 26/09, 06:30View analysis ↗ | WTA Jingshan | Jiaqi Wang | Hard Bo3 | 60% | 0% (1) | 1.2-0.9 | 10.6-10.3 | – | 1.3 | 1.1 | 61.1% | 48.8% | 1–1 | 1.44 | ||
| Ying Zhang | 40% | 50% (2) | 1-1.4 | 10.8-11.6 | 4.8 | 2.1 | 58.9% | 44% | 2.63 | |||||||
| 26/09, 06:30View analysis ↗ | WTA Jingshan | Meiqi Guo | Hard Bo3 | 40% | 60% (5) | 1.2-1.2 | 10.3-10.4 | – | 2.6 | 2.3 | 61.3% | 50.3% | – | 3.75 | ||
| Natsumi Kawaguchi | 40% | 50% (2) | 1-1.2 | 10.2-9.8 | 3 | 2.8 | 62.3% | 61.9% | 1.25 | |||||||
| 26/09, 07:00View analysis ↗ | ATP Hangzhou | Daniil Medvedev | Hard Bo3 | 50% | 50% (8) | 1.5-1.3 | 15.4-14.2 | o 1.72 L 21.5 u 2.00 |
10.5 | 6.2 | 77.2% | 45.4% | – | 1.25 | ||
| Valentin Royer | 70% | 70% (10) | 1.6-1 | 14-11.3 | 6.8 | 4.6 | 69.6% | 44.8% | 4.00 | |||||||
| 26/09, 07:00View analysis ↗ | ATP Hangzhou | Bu Yunchaokete | Hard Bo3 | 50% | 50% (10) | 1.4-1.2 | 12.5-11.7 | o 1.90 L 23.5 u 1.80 |
6.1 | 3.8 | 77.8% | 54% | – | 2.10 | ||
| Kamil Majchrzak | 40% | 38% (8) | 1-1.4 | 11.7-12.4 | 6.8 | 2.5 | 70.1% | 38.4% | 1.73 | |||||||
| 26/09, 07:00View analysis ↗ | ATP Hangzhou | Quentin Halys | Hard Bo3 | 60% | 57% (7) | 1.8-1.1 | 16.5-14.6 | o 1.83 L 23.5 u 1.83 |
13.7 | 4.8 | 82.5% | 48.6% | 1–1 | 2.10 | ||
| Roman Safiullin | 60% | 50% (6) | 1.7-1.4 | 16-14.1 | 5.8 | 2.5 | 74.1% | 42% | 1.73 | |||||||
| 26/09, 07:00View analysis ↗ | ATP Chengdu | Juan Manuel Cerundolo | Hard Bo3 | 50% | 56% (9) | 1.3-1.2 | 11.2-12.5 | o 1.90 L 22.5 u 1.80 |
6 | 3.3 | 73.8% | 28.1% | 0–2 | 2.38 | ||
| Alejandro Davidovich Fokina | 80% | – | 2.2-0.6 | 15.7-12.3 | 6.2 | 1.9 | 75.8% | 39% | 1.57 | |||||||
| 26/09, 07:30View analysis ↗ | ATP Hangzhou | Coleman Wong | Hard Bo3 | 70% | 70% (10) | 1.6-0.9 | 12.4-11.6 | o 1.90 L 22.5 u 1.80 |
11.3 | 4.7 | 77.6% | 36.1% | – | 1.57 | ||
| Adolfo Daniel Vallejo | 40% | 43% (7) | 1.1-1.5 | 11.4-13.2 | 4 | 3.4 | 70.5% | 42.8% | 2.38 | |||||||
| 26/09, 08:00View analysis ↗ | WTA Jingshan | Polina Leykina | Hard Bo3 | 40% | 0% (2) | 0.9-1.2 | 7.7-9.3 | – | 0.3 | 2 | 51.2% | 33% | 1–0 | 3.50 | ||
| Wushuang Zheng | 60% | 0% (1) | 1.3-1 | 11.6-11.6 | 0.4 | 1.6 | 60.4% | 63% | 1.28 | |||||||
| 26/09, 08:30View analysis ↗ | ATP Chengdu | Federico Cina | Hard Bo3 | 50% | 50% (10) | 1.1-1.3 | 11-11.7 | o 1.83 L 22.5 u 1.83 |
4.4 | 2.9 | 66.8% | 39.9% | 0–1 | 1.91 | ||
| Alexandre Muller | 50% | 63% (8) | 1.1-1.1 | 10.9-10.7 | 4.1 | 2.8 | 73.2% | 37.3% | 1.91 | |||||||
| 26/09, 08:30View analysis ↗ | ATP Chengdu | Martin Damm | Hard Bo3 | 50% | 50% (10) | 1.4-1.2 | 13.6-12.9 | o 1.83 L 24.5 u 1.83 |
12.3 | 4.6 | 76.2% | 41.7% | 1–0 | 3.20 | ||
| Hubert Hurkacz | 70% | 70% (10) | 1.8-1 | 15.5-12.2 | 12.9 | 3.9 | 77.1% | 41.8% | 1.36 | |||||||
| 26/09, 09:00View analysis ↗ | W15 Constanta | Cristiana Nicoleta Todoni | Clay Bo3 | 70% | 100% (3) | 1.5-0.8 | 11.2-8 | – | 1 | 4.2 | 66.4% | 54% | – | 2.10 | ||
| Alesia Breaz | 90% | 100% (3) | 1.9-0.3 | 12.3-6.2 | 0.6 | 3.8 | 64% | 60% | 1.67 | |||||||
| 26/09, 09:00View analysis ↗ | M25 Sharm El Sheikh | Robert Strombachs | Hard Bo3 | 60% | 100% (3) | 1.3-1 | 11.6-10.5 | – | 3.3 | 4.5 | 73.4% | 40.8% | – | 2.10 | ||
| Branko Djuric | 100% | 100% (2) | 2-0.4 | 13.8-8.2 | 5.9 | 3.6 | 79.3% | 45.7% | 1.67 | |||||||
| 26/09, 10:30View analysis ↗ | ATP Chengdu | Valentin Vacherot | Hard Bo3 | 50% | 40% (5) | 1.4-1.4 | 14-13.9 | o 1.90 L 23.5 u 1.80 |
12.2 | 5 | 77.6% | 27% | – | 1.80 | ||
| Lloyd Harris | 80% | 80% (10) | 1.9-0.8 | 15.6-12.5 | 13.2 | 1.6 | 79.2% | 57.2% | 2.00 | |||||||
| 27/09, 07:00View analysis ↗ | ATP Chengdu | Adrian Mannarino | Hard Bo3 | 40% | 40% (10) | 0.9-1.5 | 10.7-12.5 | o 1.80 L 21.5 u 1.90 |
4.1 | 2.6 | 71.3% | 32.9% | 1–3 | 3.20 | ||
| Denis Shapovalov | 70% | 70% (10) | 1.8-0.9 | 15-12 | 7.7 | 6.7 | 74.9% | 48.9% | 1.36 | |||||||
| 27/09, 07:00View analysis ↗ | ATP Chengdu | Jenson Brooksby | Hard Bo3 | 50% | 50% (10) | 1.2-1.2 | 12-11.8 | o 1.83 L 22.5 u 1.83 |
3.5 | 0.9 | 71.5% | 47.3% | 1–2 | 1.80 | ||
| Nikoloz Basilashvili | 50% | 67% (6) | 1.2-1.1 | 11.7-10.8 | 6.2 | 3.8 | 74.3% | 34.9% | 2.00 |
Frequently asked questions
What is surface Elo?
A rating computed separately for clay, hard, grass and carpet: a player can be much stronger on one surface than another.
What do aces and double faults measure?
Aces are winning serves (serve power); double faults are two serve misses in a row (consistency). Both help estimate games and sets.
How does BetsTalent calculate probabilities?
With an in-house model: opponent-adjusted Elo and, in football, Poisson/Dixon-Coles with per-team attack and defence. In tennis, Elo by surface. No raw averages.

