Prediction: JyTy vs ACF
- ACF2-0JyTy
| JyTy | Draw | ACF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Our model | 51% | 24% | 25% |
| Market | 52% | 21% | 26% |
The bar above blends our model with the market: where our probability diverges most from the odds is where the model sees the widest gap.
Match keys
- Cards-heavy: 6.1 🟨 combined avg.
Statistics · 10/10 matches analysed
F = for · A = against · HT = half-time · FT = full-time
| JyTy | ACF | |
|---|---|---|
| Goals for / against (FT) | 0.9 / 1.9 | 1.1 / 2.3 |
| Goals for / against (HT) | 0.4 / 1.1 | 0.3 / 1 |
| Half-time result (W/D/L) | 13/13/75% | 11/22/67% |
| Corners (HT / FT) | 1.3 / 5 | 1.4 / 2.2 |
| Cards (🟨 / 🟥) | 2.9 / 0 | 3.2 / 0.1 |
Head-to-head (H2H) · JyTy 0–0–1 ACF
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Home | Score | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25/06/26 Finland Kolmonen | ACF | 2-0 HT 0-0 | JyTy |
Standings · Finland Kolmonen · Kolmonen 2026, Western, Group 1
Swipe the table sideways →
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EuPa | 20 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 43 | 13 | 46 |
| 2 | IFK Mariehamn II | 20 | 13 | 3 | 4 | 48 | 22 | 42 |
| 3 | Peimari United | 20 | 9 | 8 | 3 | 35 | 22 | 35 |
| 4 | PIF Parainen | 19 | 10 | 4 | 5 | 35 | 23 | 34 |
| 5 | LTU | 20 | 9 | 3 | 8 | 28 | 25 | 30 |
| 6 | SAPA/2 | 20 | 9 | 3 | 8 | 31 | 31 | 30 |
| 7 | MaPS | 20 | 9 | 2 | 9 | 35 | 33 | 29 |
| 8 | KaaPo | 20 | 8 | 0 | 12 | 33 | 42 | 24 |
| 9 | VG-62 | 19 | 7 | 0 | 12 | 26 | 32 | 21 |
| 10 | PiPS | 20 | 6 | 2 | 12 | 21 | 40 | 20 |
| 11 | JyTy | 20 | 4 | 4 | 12 | 21 | 46 | 16 |
| 12 | ACF | 20 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 17 | 44 | 11 |
Common opponents 8 opponents
How each team fared against the same recent opponents
| Opponent | JyTy | ACF |
|---|---|---|
| PiPS | 0-1 L | 2-1 W |
| LTU | 1-3 L | 1-4 L |
| IFK Mariehamn II | 1-1 D | 2-2 D |
| VG-62 | 2-1 W | 0-3 L |
| EuPa | 1-1 D | 0-2 L |
| KaaPo | 2-1 W | 0-2 L |
| PIF Parainen | 1-3 L | 2-4 L |
| MaPS | 1-1 D | 0-2 L |
| Record vs common | 2 W 3 D 3 L | 1 W 1 D 6 L |
Better against common opponents: JyTy (5 of 8 head-to-heads won)
Last 10 matches played
The averages above come from these matches. W = win, D = draw, L = loss. Common opponents to both are in blue.
JyTy
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18/09 | PiPS Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 0-1 | 5 | 0 | L |
| 11/09 | LTU Finland Kolmonen |
1-2 | 1-3 | 4 | 5 | L |
| 05/09 | IFK Mariehamn II Finland Kolmonen |
– | 1-1 | – | – | D |
| 26/08 | VG-62 Finland Kolmonen |
1-0 | 2-1 | 4 | 1 | W |
| 22/08 | Peimari United Finland Kolmonen |
– | 0-2 | – | – | L |
| 15/08 | EuPa Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 1-1 | 10 | 2 | D |
| 06/08 | KaaPo Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 2-1 | 2 | 7 | W |
| 01/08 | PIF Parainen Finland Kolmonen |
0-2 | 1-3 | 3 | 5 | L |
| 23/07 | MaPS Finland Kolmonen |
1-1 | 1-1 | 6 | 2 | D |
| 18/07 | IFK Mariehamn II Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 0-5 | 6 | 1 | L |
ACF
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18/09 | KaaPo Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 0-2 | 2 | 3 | L |
| 12/09 | PIF Parainen Finland Kolmonen |
– | 2-4 | – | – | L |
| 04/09 | MaPS Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 0-2 | 1 | 4 | L |
| 25/08 | SAPA/2 Finland Kolmonen |
1-2 | 2-3 | 1 | 1 | L |
| 21/08 | EuPa Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 0-2 | 2 | 5 | L |
| 14/08 | PiPS Finland Kolmonen |
1-0 | 2-1 | 6 | 0 | W |
| 07/08 | LTU Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 1-4 | 0 | 6 | L |
| 02/08 | IFK Mariehamn II Finland Kolmonen |
1-2 | 2-2 | 2 | 5 | D |
| 23/07 | VG-62 Finland Kolmonen |
0-2 | 0-3 | 2 | 2 | L |
| 25/06 | JyTy Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 2-0 | 4 | 4 | W |
Frequently asked questions
Who is the favourite in JyTy vs ACF?
According to our model, the most likely result is a JyTy win (51%). Probabilities: JyTy 51%, draw 23%, ACF 26%.
How many goals are expected in JyTy vs ACF?
The model expects 3.19 goals (JyTy 1.9 · ACF 1.29), with a 56% chance of under 3.5 goals.
Will both teams score in JyTy vs ACF?
The model gives a 57% chance that both teams score.
What is the most likely score?
The most likely score according to our model is 1-1.

