Prediction: MaPS vs PiPS
- PiPS2-3MaPS
- MaPS2-0PiPS
- PiPS2-5MaPS
| MaPS | Draw | PiPS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Our model | 65% | 20% | 15% |
| Market | 66% | 18% | 16% |
The bar above blends our model with the market: where our probability diverges most from the odds is where the model sees the widest gap.
Match keys
- Our model (Elo, opponent-adjusted) favours MaPS (rating 1484 vs 1421).
- H2H favours MaPS: 3-0-0.
- High corners: 11.8 combined avg.
- Cards-heavy: 5.4 🟨 combined avg.
Statistics · 10/10 matches analysed
F = for · A = against · HT = half-time · FT = full-time
| MaPS | PiPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Goals for / against (FT) | 1.3 / 1.9 | 1 / 2.4 |
| Goals for / against (HT) | 0.6 / 1 | 0.1 / 0.6 |
| Half-time result (W/D/L) | 11/33/56% | 0/50/50% |
| Corners (HT / FT) | 2.7 / 6.8 | 2.5 / 5 |
| Cards (🟨 / 🟥) | 3.2 / 0.3 | 2.1 / 0.5 |
Head-to-head (H2H) · MaPS 3–0–0 PiPS
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Home | Score | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22/05/26 Finland Kolmonen | PiPS | 2-3 | MaPS |
| 01/08/25 Finland Kolmonen | MaPS | 2-0 | PiPS |
| 03/05/25 Finland Kolmonen | PiPS | 2-5 | MaPS |
Standings · Finland Kolmonen · Kolmonen 2026, Western, Group 1
Swipe the table sideways →
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EuPa | 16 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 35 | 11 | 36 |
| 2 | IFK Mariehamn II | 16 | 11 | 2 | 3 | 39 | 15 | 35 |
| 3 | PIF Parainen | 15 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 29 | 15 | 30 |
| 4 | SalPa 2 | 17 | 8 | 3 | 6 | 26 | 22 | 27 |
| 5 | Peimari United | 16 | 6 | 7 | 3 | 28 | 18 | 25 |
| 6 | MaPS | 16 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 25 | 26 | 23 |
| 7 | LTU | 16 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 20 | 21 | 23 |
| 8 | VG-62 | 16 | 7 | 0 | 9 | 20 | 22 | 21 |
| 9 | KaaPo | 16 | 7 | 0 | 9 | 28 | 33 | 21 |
| 10 | JyTy | 17 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 19 | 41 | 15 |
| 11 | ACF | 17 | 2 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 36 | 11 |
| 12 | PiPS | 16 | 2 | 2 | 12 | 14 | 38 | 8 |
Common opponents 10 opponents
How each team fared against the same recent opponents
| Opponent | MaPS | PiPS |
|---|---|---|
| LTU | 1-2 L | 2-4 L |
| IFK Mariehamn II | 1-0 W | 1-3 L |
| VG-62 | 2-1 W | 0-3 L |
| Peimari United | 1-2 L | 2-2 D |
| JyTy | 1-1 D | 1-0 W |
| PIF Parainen | 0-2 L | 1-3 L |
| KaaPo | 1-2 L | 1-0 W |
| EuPa | 1-5 L | 1-4 L |
| SalPa 2 | 2-4 L | 0-3 L |
| ACF | 3-0 W | 1-2 L |
| Record vs common | 3 W 1 D 6 L | 2 W 1 D 7 L |
Better against common opponents: MaPS (5 of 10 head-to-heads won)
Last 10 matches played
The averages above come from these matches. W = win, D = draw, L = loss. Common opponents to both are in blue.
MaPS
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21/08 | LTU Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 1-2 | 7 | 3 | L |
| 15/08 | IFK Mariehamn II Finland Kolmonen |
– | 1-0 | – | – | W |
| 07/08 | VG-62 Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 2-1 | 6 | 4 | W |
| 31/07 | Peimari United Finland Kolmonen |
0-2 | 1-2 | 5 | 4 | L |
| 23/07 | JyTy Finland Kolmonen |
1-1 | 1-1 | 6 | 2 | D |
| 27/06 | PIF Parainen Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 0-2 | 7 | 2 | L |
| 17/06 | KaaPo Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 1-2 | 5 | 9 | L |
| 12/06 | EuPa Finland Kolmonen |
0-2 | 1-5 | 5 | 5 | L |
| 02/06 | SalPa 2 Finland Kolmonen |
1-1 | 2-4 | 9 | 0 | L |
| 29/05 | ACF Finland Kolmonen |
3-0 | 3-0 | 11 | 3 | W |
PiPS
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 20/08 | SalPa 2 Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 0-3 | 3 | 3 | L |
| 14/08 | ACF Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 1-2 | 11 | 0 | L |
| 08/08 | EuPa Finland Kolmonen |
– | 1-4 | – | – | L |
| 31/07 | LTU Finland Kolmonen |
– | 2-4 | – | – | L |
| 25/07 | IFK Mariehamn II Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 1-3 | 5 | 3 | L |
| 25/06 | Peimari United Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 2-2 | 5 | 2 | D |
| 17/06 | VG-62 Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 0-3 | 4 | 3 | L |
| 11/06 | JyTy Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 1-0 | 2 | 7 | W |
| 03/06 | KaaPo Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 1-0 | 0 | 0 | W |
| 28/05 | PIF Parainen Finland Kolmonen |
1-1 | 1-3 | 10 | 3 | L |
Frequently asked questions
Who is the favourite in MaPS vs PiPS?
According to our model, the most likely result is a MaPS win (65%). Probabilities: MaPS 65%, draw 19%, PiPS 16%.
How many goals are expected in MaPS vs PiPS?
The model expects 3.54 goals (MaPS 2.41 · PiPS 1.13), with a 52% chance of under 3.5 goals.
Will both teams score in MaPS vs PiPS?
The model gives a 57% chance that both teams score.
What is the most likely score?
The most likely score according to our model is 2-1.

