Prediction: LTU vs MaPS
- MaPS3-1LTU
- LTU0-1MaPS
- MaPS2-1LTU
- LTU1-2MaPS
| LTU | Draw | MaPS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Our model | 41% | 25% | 33% |
| Market | 43% | 23% | 35% |
The bar above blends our model with the market: where our probability diverges most from the odds is where the model sees the widest gap.
Match keys
- H2H favours MaPS: 4-0-0.
- High corners: 12.6 combined avg.
- Cards-heavy: 5.9 🟨 combined avg.
Statistics · 10/10 matches analysed
F = for · A = against · HT = half-time · FT = full-time
| LTU | MaPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Goals for / against (FT) | 1.5 / 1.2 | 1.5 / 1.9 |
| Goals for / against (HT) | 0.6 / 0.4 | 0.6 / 1 |
| Half-time result (W/D/L) | 33/33/33% | 13/38/50% |
| Corners (HT / FT) | 3 / 5.9 | 2.5 / 6.8 |
| Cards (🟨 / 🟥) | 2.7 / 0 | 3.3 / 0.4 |
Head-to-head (H2H) · LTU 0–0–4 MaPS
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Home | Score | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| 14/05/26 Finland Kolmonen | MaPS | 3-1 HT 1-0 | LTU |
| 28/02/26 Finland Cup | LTU | 0-1 HT 0-0 | MaPS |
| 22/08/25 Finland Kolmonen | MaPS | 2-1 HT 1-0 | LTU |
| 16/05/25 Finland Kolmonen | LTU | 1-2 HT 0-1 | MaPS |
Standings · Finland Kolmonen · Kolmonen 2026, Western, Group 1
Swipe the table sideways →
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IFK Mariehamn II | 15 | 11 | 1 | 3 | 38 | 14 | 34 |
| 2 | EuPa | 15 | 10 | 3 | 2 | 33 | 11 | 33 |
| 3 | PIF Parainen | 14 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 28 | 14 | 29 |
| 4 | MaPS | 15 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 24 | 24 | 23 |
| 5 | Peimari United | 15 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 26 | 18 | 22 |
| 6 | VG-62 | 14 | 7 | 0 | 7 | 19 | 18 | 21 |
| 7 | SalPa 2 | 15 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 20 | 20 | 21 |
| 8 | LTU | 15 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 18 | 20 | 20 |
| 9 | KaaPo | 15 | 6 | 0 | 9 | 26 | 33 | 18 |
| 10 | JyTy | 15 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 17 | 38 | 12 |
| 11 | ACF | 15 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 13 | 31 | 11 |
| 12 | PiPS | 15 | 2 | 2 | 11 | 14 | 35 | 8 |
Common opponents 10 opponents
How each team fared against the same recent opponents
| Opponent | LTU | MaPS |
|---|---|---|
| SalPa 2 | 2-1 W | 2-4 L |
| ACF | 4-1 W | 3-0 W |
| PiPS | 4-2 W | 3-2 W |
| EuPa | 0-0 D | 1-5 L |
| IFK Mariehamn II | 0-1 L | 1-0 W |
| VG-62 | 2-1 W | 2-1 W |
| Peimari United | 1-0 W | 1-2 L |
| JyTy | 2-3 L | 1-1 D |
| KaaPo | 0-2 L | 1-2 L |
| PIF Parainen | 0-1 L | 0-2 L |
| Record vs common | 5 W 1 D 4 L | 4 W 1 D 5 L |
Better against common opponents: LTU (5 of 10 head-to-heads won)
Last 10 matches played
The averages above come from these matches. W = win, D = draw, L = loss. Common opponents to both are in blue.
LTU
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 11/08 | SalPa 2 Finland Kolmonen |
1-1 | 2-1 | 4 | 3 | W |
| 07/08 | ACF Finland Kolmonen |
1-0 | 4-1 | 7 | 6 | W |
| 31/07 | PiPS Finland Kolmonen |
– | 4-2 | – | – | W |
| 25/07 | EuPa Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 0-0 | 4 | 1 | D |
| 04/07 | IFK Mariehamn II Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 0-1 | 0 | 2 | L |
| 26/06 | VG-62 Finland Kolmonen |
2-0 | 2-1 | 9 | 3 | W |
| 13/06 | Peimari United Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 1-0 | 3 | 2 | W |
| 04/06 | JyTy Finland Kolmonen |
1-0 | 2-3 | 14 | 3 | L |
| 29/05 | KaaPo Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 0-2 | 8 | 3 | L |
| 22/05 | PIF Parainen Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 0-1 | 4 | 1 | L |
MaPS
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15/08 | IFK Mariehamn II Finland Kolmonen |
– | 1-0 | – | – | W |
| 07/08 | VG-62 Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 2-1 | 6 | 4 | W |
| 31/07 | Peimari United Finland Kolmonen |
0-2 | 1-2 | 5 | 4 | L |
| 23/07 | JyTy Finland Kolmonen |
1-1 | 1-1 | 6 | 2 | D |
| 27/06 | PIF Parainen Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 0-2 | 7 | 2 | L |
| 17/06 | KaaPo Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 1-2 | 5 | 9 | L |
| 12/06 | EuPa Finland Kolmonen |
0-2 | 1-5 | 5 | 5 | L |
| 02/06 | SalPa 2 Finland Kolmonen |
1-1 | 2-4 | 9 | 0 | L |
| 29/05 | ACF Finland Kolmonen |
3-0 | 3-0 | 11 | 3 | W |
| 22/05 | PiPS Finland Kolmonen |
– | 3-2 | – | – | W |
Frequently asked questions
Who is the favourite in LTU vs MaPS?
According to our model, the most likely result is a LTU win (42%). Probabilities: LTU 42%, draw 24%, MaPS 34%.
How many goals are expected in LTU vs MaPS?
The model expects 3.2 goals (LTU 1.7 · MaPS 1.5), with a 54% chance of under 3.25 goals.
Will both teams score in LTU vs MaPS?
The model gives a 58% chance that both teams score.
What is the most likely score?
The most likely score according to our model is 1-1.

