Prediction: LePa vs MPS
- MPS0-1LePa
| LePa | Draw | MPS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Our model | 67% | 20% | 13% |
| Market | 68% | 19% | 14% |
The bar above blends our model with the market: where our probability diverges most from the odds is where the model sees the widest gap.
Match keys
- Our model (Elo, opponent-adjusted) favours LePa (rating 1548 vs 1456).
- Cards-heavy: 5.4 🟨 combined avg.
Statistics · 10/10 matches analysed
F = for · A = against · HT = half-time · FT = full-time
| LePa | MPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Goals for / against (FT) | 1.9 / 1.7 | 0.7 / 1.6 |
| Goals for / against (HT) | 0.8 / 0.5 | 0.3 / 1.1 |
| Half-time result (W/D/L) | 50/38/13% | 11/33/56% |
| Corners (HT / FT) | 2.8 / 5 | 1.8 / 3.8 |
| Cards (🟨 / 🟥) | 2.9 / 0.1 | 2.6 / 0.1 |
Head-to-head (H2H) · LePa 1–0–0 MPS
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Home | Score | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22/05/26 Finland Kolmonen | MPS | 0-1 HT 0-1 | LePa |
Standings · Finland Kolmonen · Kolmonen 2026, Southern, Group 1
Swipe the table sideways →
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | EIF Academy | 16 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 59 | 22 | 38 |
| 2 | ESPA | 16 | 12 | 2 | 2 | 41 | 14 | 38 |
| 3 | LePa | 16 | 10 | 2 | 4 | 35 | 28 | 32 |
| 4 | Poxyt | 16 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 35 | 34 | 26 |
| 5 | LoPa | 16 | 7 | 2 | 7 | 26 | 26 | 23 |
| 6 | NuPS | 16 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 26 | 22 | 22 |
| 7 | GrIFK Reservi | 16 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 30 | 31 | 20 |
| 8 | Gilla FC | 16 | 6 | 2 | 8 | 32 | 35 | 20 |
| 9 | PPJ/Ruoholahti | 16 | 4 | 3 | 9 | 23 | 41 | 15 |
| 10 | MPS | 16 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 15 | 29 | 13 |
| 11 | HooGee | 16 | 4 | 1 | 11 | 29 | 45 | 13 |
| 12 | EPS Reservi | 16 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 22 | 46 | 13 |
Common opponents 6 opponents
How each team fared against the same recent opponents
| Opponent | LePa | MPS |
|---|---|---|
| NuPS | 1-0 W | 0-2 L |
| PPJ/Ruoholahti | 3-1 W | 0-0 D |
| GrIFK Reservi | 0-4 L | 0-3 L |
| HooGee | 3-1 W | 2-0 W |
| LoPa | 3-1 W | 0-2 L |
| Poxyt | 1-1 D | 3-2 W |
| Record vs common | 4 W 1 D 1 L | 2 W 1 D 3 L |
Better against common opponents: LePa (3 of 6 head-to-heads won)
Last 10 matches played
The averages above come from these matches. W = win, D = draw, L = loss. Common opponents to both are in blue.
LePa
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21/08 | NuPS Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 1-0 | 3 | 4 | W |
| 10/06 | PPJ/Ruoholahti Finland Kolmonen |
1-0 | 3-1 | 7 | 4 | W |
| 07/06 | GrIFK Reservi Finland Kolmonen |
0-2 | 0-4 | 2 | 3 | L |
| 27/05 | EIF Academy Finland Kolmonen |
1-1 | 3-2 | 6 | 4 | W |
| 22/05 | MPS Finland Kolmonen |
1-0 | 1-0 | 4 | 4 | W |
| 13/05 | NuPS Finland Kolmonen |
– | 3-3 | – | – | D |
| 06/05 | HooGee Finland Kolmonen |
1-0 | 3-1 | 7 | 0 | W |
| 03/05 | LoPa Finland Kolmonen |
– | 3-1 | – | – | W |
| 22/04 | Poxyt Finland Kolmonen |
1-1 | 1-1 | 7 | 4 | D |
| 19/04 | Gilla FC Finland Kolmonen |
1-0 | 1-4 | 4 | 1 | L |
MPS
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 21/08 | ESPA Finland Kolmonen |
1-1 | 2-2 | 2 | 5 | D |
| 06/08 | GrIFK Reservi Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 0-3 | 2 | 2 | L |
| 28/06 | Poxyt Finland Kolmonen |
1-2 | 3-2 | 6 | 2 | W |
| 17/06 | NuPS Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 0-2 | 2 | 4 | L |
| 14/06 | EPS Reservi Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 0-0 | 2 | 3 | D |
| 05/06 | HooGee Finland Kolmonen |
1-0 | 2-0 | 5 | 3 | W |
| 28/05 | PPJ/Ruoholahti Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 0-0 | 10 | 0 | D |
| 22/05 | LePa Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 0-1 | 3 | 4 | L |
| 15/05 | ESPA Finland Kolmonen |
0-4 | 0-4 | 2 | 1 | L |
| 08/05 | LoPa Finland Kolmonen |
– | 0-2 | – | – | L |
Frequently asked questions
Who is the favourite in LePa vs MPS?
According to our model, the most likely result is a LePa win (67%). Probabilities: LePa 67%, draw 19%, MPS 13%.
How many goals are expected in LePa vs MPS?
The model expects 3.12 goals (LePa 2.23 · MPS 0.89), with a 54% chance of under 3.25 goals.
Will both teams score in LePa vs MPS?
The model gives a 53% chance that both teams score.
What is the most likely score?
The most likely score according to our model is 2-0.

