Football · Latvia Virsliga · 27/07, 17:00

Prediction: Tukums 2000 vs RFS

Prediction summary
Expected goals
3.86Total
Tukums 20000.93
RFS2.93
1X2
8% 14% 78%
Tukums 2000 Draw RFS
Markets
Over 3.5 goals 52% Both teams to score 55%
Most likely score
0-2
Recent form · 10 last
Tukums 2000 1-1-8 (W-D-L)
LLDWLLLLLL
RFS 8-1-1 (W-D-L)
WLWWWDWWWW
Head-to-head
Tukums 2000 0–6 RFS (6 last)
Our model (Elo) vs Market Rating Elo · Tukums 2000 1383 · RFS 1626
Tukums 2000DrawRFS
Our model8%14%77%
Market8%14%78%
Estimated total (ours) 3.86 goals · Bet365 line 3.5 · +0.4

The bar above blends our model with the market: where our probability diverges most from the odds is where the model sees the widest gap.

Model analysis
1st-half goalsOver 1.5 · 73%model estimate

Match keys

  • Our model (Elo, opponent-adjusted) favours RFS (rating 1383 vs 1626).
  • H2H favours RFS: 6-0-0.
  • Cards-heavy: 7.1 🟨 combined avg.

Statistics · 10/10 matches analysed

F = for · A = against · HT = half-time · FT = full-time

Tukums 2000RFS
Goals for / against (FT)1.1 / 2.52.3 / 0.6
Goals for / against (HT)0.6 / 11 / 0.3
Half-time result (W/D/L)30/30/40%60/30/10%
Corners (HT / FT)2 / 3.93.3 / 6
Cards (🟨 / 🟥)3.1 / 0.44 / 0.3

Head-to-head (H2H) · Tukums 2000 006 RFS

Swipe the table sideways →

DateHomeScoreAway
25/05/26
Latvia Virsliga
RFS3-1
HT 2-0
Tukums 2000
13/04/26
Latvia Virsliga
Tukums 20001-2
HT 0-1
RFS
19/10/25
Latvia Virsliga
Tukums 20002-4
HT 2-2
RFS
26/07/25
Latvia Virsliga
RFS6-2
HT 3-2
Tukums 2000
25/05/25
Latvia Virsliga
Tukums 20002-5
HT 0-3
RFS
09/04/25
Latvia Virsliga
RFS2-0
HT 2-0
Tukums 2000

Standings · Latvia Virsliga

Swipe the table sideways →

#Team PWDL GFGAPts
1 RFS 231922 551659
2 Riga FC 231841 682058
3 FK Auda 221246 372640
4 BFC Daugavpils 23869 292930
5 FK Liepaja 228410 283428
6 SK Super Nova 238312 253527
7 FK Jelgava 236710 243925
8 SC Grobinas 234811 153520
9 Tukums 2000 233812 384717
10 Ogre United 233416 215913

Common opponents 7 opponents

How each team fared against the same recent opponents

OpponentTukums 2000RFS
Riga FC 1-3 L 1-2 L
SC Grobinas 1-3 L 3-1 W
Ogre United 2-3 L 6-0 W
FK Jelgava 1-4 L 1-0 W
FK Auda 2-1 W 1-1 D
BFC Daugavpils 1-1 D 3-1 W
FK Liepaja 0-3 L 2-0 W
Record vs common 1 W 1 D 5 L 5 W 1 D 1 L

Better against common opponents: RFS (6 of 7 head-to-heads won)

Last 10 matches played

The averages above come from these matches. W = win, D = draw, L = loss. Common opponents to both are in blue.

Tukums 2000

LLDWLLLLLL

Swipe the table sideways →

Date Opponent HT FT Cor.Cards Res.
18/07 Riga FC
Latvia Virsliga
1-0 1-3 23 L
11/07 SK Super Nova
Latvia Cup
1-0 1-2 61 L
05/07 SC Grobinas
Latvia Virsliga
0-2 1-3 64 L
01/07 SK Super Nova
Latvia Virsliga
1-1 1-2 72 L
26/06 Ogre United
Latvia Virsliga
2-1 2-3 85 L
21/06 FK Jelgava
Latvia Virsliga
0-1 1-4 13 L
17/06 FK Auda
Latvia Virsliga
1-1 2-1 26 W
12/06 BFC Daugavpils
Latvia Virsliga
0-0 1-1 32 D
30/05 FK Liepaja
Latvia Virsliga
0-2 0-3 45 L
25/05 RFS
Latvia Virsliga
0-2 1-3 04 L

RFS

WLWWWDWWWW

Swipe the table sideways →

Date Opponent HT FT Cor.Cards Res.
20/07 FK Jelgava
Latvia Virsliga
1-0 1-0 113 W
16/07 Glentoran
UEFA Conference League Qualifying
1-0 2-0 54 W
12/07 FK Jelgava
Latvia Cup
1-0 2-0 143 W
09/07 Glentoran
UEFA Conference League Qualifying
1-1 2-1 66 W
04/07 FK Auda
Latvia Virsliga
0-0 1-1 34 D
30/06 BFC Daugavpils
Latvia Virsliga
1-0 3-1 43 W
26/06 FK Liepaja
Latvia Virsliga
0-0 2-0 47 W
22/06 Ogre United
Latvia Virsliga
3-0 6-0 84 W
17/06 Riga FC
Latvia Virsliga
0-2 1-2 19 L
13/06 SC Grobinas
Latvia Virsliga
2-0 3-1 40 W

Frequently asked questions

Who is the favourite in Tukums 2000 vs RFS?

According to our model, the most likely result is an RFS win (78%). Probabilities: Tukums 2000 8%, draw 14%, RFS 78%.

How many goals are expected in Tukums 2000 vs RFS?

The model expects 3.86 goals (Tukums 2000 0.93 · RFS 2.93), with a 52% chance of over 3.5 goals.

Will both teams score in Tukums 2000 vs RFS?

The model gives a 55% chance that both teams score.

What is the most likely score?

The most likely score according to our model is 0-2.