Prediction: Progresul Mogosoaia vs FC Voluntari II
Team pages: Progresul Mogosoaia · FC Voluntari II
| Progresul Mogosoaia | Draw | FC Voluntari II | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Our model | 68% | 19% | 13% |
| Market | 67% | 20% | 13% |
The bar above blends our model with the market: where our probability diverges most from the odds is where the model sees the widest gap.
Match keys
- Our model (Elo, opponent-adjusted) favours Progresul Mogosoaia (rating 1507 vs 1404).
- Cards-heavy: 7 🟨 combined avg.
Statistics · 10/10 matches analysed
F = for · A = against · HT = half-time · FT = full-time
| Progresul Mogosoaia | FC Voluntari II | |
|---|---|---|
| Goals for / against (FT) | 1.3 / 1.8 | 1 / 2.6 |
| Goals for / against (HT) | 0.3 / 0.9 | 0.3 / 0.6 |
| Half-time result (W/D/L) | 0/43/57% | 0/63/38% |
| Corners (HT / FT) | 2.6 / 4.3 | 1.3 / 5.1 |
| Cards (🟨 / 🟥) | 5 / 0.3 | 2 / 0.1 |
Standings · Romania Liga III · Liga 3 26/27, Group 5
Swipe the table sideways →
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | AFC Progresul Spartac Bucuresti | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 3 |
| 2 | Dunarea Giurgiu | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| 3 | Acs Axi Arena | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 3 | Dinamo Bucharest II | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| 5 | Progresul Mogosoaia | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 5 | CSM Alexandria | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 1 |
| 7 | ACS LPS HD Clinceni | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 7 | CS Omega Sport Bucuresti | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| 9 | Steaua Bucharest II | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 9 | FC Voluntari II | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 11 | Cetatea Turnu Magurele | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| 12 | Oxigen Bucuresti | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
Last 10 matches played
The averages above come from these matches. W = win, D = draw, L = loss. Common opponents to both are in blue.
Progresul Mogosoaia
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28/08 | CSM Alexandria Romania Liga III |
– | 2-2 | – | – | D |
| 16/05 | CSO Baicoi Romania Liga III |
1-1 | 4-2 | 1 | 6 | W |
| 09/05 | CSO Teleajenul Valeni de Munte Romania Liga III |
0-1 | 2-1 | 7 | 4 | W |
| 01/05 | CS Urban Titu Romania Liga III |
0-0 | 2-0 | – | – | W |
| 25/04 | Vointa 2024 Crevedia Romania Liga III |
1-2 | 1-4 | 2 | 6 | L |
| 18/04 | ACS Kids Tampa Brasov Romania Liga III |
0-0 | 1-0 | 6 | 3 | W |
| 10/04 | FC Pucioasa Romania Liga III |
– | 0-3 | – | – | L |
| 04/04 | CSM Sacele Romania Liga III |
0-1 | 0-2 | 7 | 9 | L |
| 28/03 | CS Urban Titu Romania Liga III |
– | 0-1 | – | – | L |
| 21/03 | CSM Sacele Romania Liga III |
0-1 | 1-3 | 3 | 4 | L |
FC Voluntari II
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 28/08 | Acs Axi Arena Romania Liga III |
0-0 | 0-1 | 3 | 3 | L |
| 16/05 | Recolta Gheorghe Doja Romania Liga III |
– | 3-4 | – | – | L |
| 08/05 | Dinamo Bucharest II Romania Liga III |
0-0 | 1-2 | 2 | 3 | L |
| 02/05 | Gloria Baneasa Romania Liga III |
0-0 | 0-3 | 9 | 3 | L |
| 24/04 | CS Agigea Romania Liga III |
0-0 | 1-0 | 5 | 2 | W |
| 18/04 | ACS Progresul Fundulea Romania Liga III |
0-1 | 0-4 | 6 | 2 | L |
| 10/04 | CSA Axiopolis Romania Liga III |
1-2 | 1-2 | 6 | 2 | L |
| 03/04 | Steaua Bucharest II Romania Liga III |
0-0 | 0-2 | 3 | 0 | L |
| 28/03 | CS Agigea Romania Liga III |
– | 1-3 | – | – | L |
| 20/03 | Inainte Modelu Romania Liga III |
1-2 | 3-5 | 7 | 2 | L |
Frequently asked questions
Who is the favourite in Progresul Mogosoaia vs FC Voluntari II?
According to our model, the most likely result is a Progresul Mogosoaia win (67%). Probabilities: Progresul Mogosoaia 67%, draw 19%, FC Voluntari II 13%.
How many goals are expected in Progresul Mogosoaia vs FC Voluntari II?
The model expects 3.49 goals (Progresul Mogosoaia 2.46 · FC Voluntari II 1.03), with a 50% chance of over 3.25 goals.
Will both teams score in Progresul Mogosoaia vs FC Voluntari II?
The model gives a 56% chance that both teams score.
What is the most likely score?
The most likely score according to our model is 2-1.