Prediction: ACF vs PiPS
- PiPS0-0ACF
| ACF | Draw | PiPS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Our model | 40% | 25% | 35% |
| Market | 41% | 24% | 36% |
The bar above blends our model with the market: where our probability diverges most from the odds is where the model sees the widest gap.
Match keys
- Cards-heavy: 5.8 🟨 combined avg.
Statistics · 10/10 matches analysed
F = for · A = against · HT = half-time · FT = full-time
| ACF | PiPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Goals for / against (FT) | 1 / 2.3 | 1.2 / 2.4 |
| Goals for / against (HT) | 0.2 / 1.4 | 0.3 / 0.6 |
| Half-time result (W/D/L) | 0/33/67% | 14/43/43% |
| Corners (HT / FT) | 1.3 / 3.3 | 2.1 / 4.6 |
| Cards (🟨 / 🟥) | 3.1 / 0.2 | 2.7 / 0.4 |
Head-to-head (H2H) · ACF 0–1–0 PiPS
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Home | Score | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| 08/05/26 Finland Kolmonen | PiPS | 0-0 HT 0-0 | ACF |
Standings · Finland Kolmonen · Kolmonen 2026, Western, Group 1
Swipe the table sideways →
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IFK Mariehamn II | 14 | 11 | 1 | 2 | 38 | 13 | 34 |
| 2 | EuPa | 14 | 10 | 2 | 2 | 32 | 10 | 32 |
| 3 | PIF Parainen | 13 | 8 | 2 | 3 | 27 | 14 | 26 |
| 4 | VG-62 | 13 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 19 | 17 | 21 |
| 5 | SalPa 2 | 15 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 20 | 20 | 21 |
| 6 | MaPS | 14 | 6 | 2 | 6 | 23 | 24 | 20 |
| 7 | LTU | 15 | 6 | 2 | 7 | 18 | 20 | 20 |
| 8 | Peimari United | 14 | 4 | 7 | 3 | 23 | 18 | 19 |
| 9 | KaaPo | 14 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 26 | 30 | 18 |
| 10 | JyTy | 14 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 16 | 37 | 11 |
| 11 | ACF | 14 | 1 | 5 | 8 | 11 | 30 | 8 |
| 12 | PiPS | 14 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 13 | 33 | 8 |
Common opponents 10 opponents
How each team fared against the same recent opponents
| Opponent | ACF | PiPS |
|---|---|---|
| LTU | 1-4 L | 2-4 L |
| IFK Mariehamn II | 2-2 D | 1-3 L |
| VG-62 | 0-3 L | 0-3 L |
| JyTy | 2-0 W | 1-0 W |
| Peimari United | 2-2 D | 2-2 D |
| KaaPo | 3-5 L | 1-0 W |
| PIF Parainen | 0-3 L | 1-3 L |
| MaPS | 0-3 L | 2-3 L |
| SalPa 2 | 0-0 D | 1-2 L |
| EuPa | 0-1 L | 1-4 L |
| Record vs common | 1 W 3 D 6 L | 2 W 1 D 7 L |
Last 10 matches played
The averages above come from these matches. W = win, D = draw, L = loss. Common opponents to both are in blue.
ACF
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/08 | LTU Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 1-4 | 0 | 6 | L |
| 02/08 | IFK Mariehamn II Finland Kolmonen |
1-2 | 2-2 | 2 | 5 | D |
| 23/07 | VG-62 Finland Kolmonen |
0-2 | 0-3 | 2 | 2 | L |
| 25/06 | JyTy Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 2-0 | 4 | 4 | W |
| 17/06 | Peimari United Finland Kolmonen |
1-1 | 2-2 | 6 | 3 | D |
| 12/06 | KaaPo Finland Kolmonen |
0-2 | 3-5 | 3 | 1 | L |
| 05/06 | PIF Parainen Finland Kolmonen |
0-2 | 0-3 | 5 | 2 | L |
| 29/05 | MaPS Finland Kolmonen |
0-3 | 0-3 | 4 | 3 | L |
| 22/05 | SalPa 2 Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 0-0 | 4 | 4 | D |
| 14/05 | EuPa Finland Kolmonen |
– | 0-1 | – | – | L |
PiPS
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/08 | EuPa Finland Kolmonen |
– | 1-4 | – | – | L |
| 31/07 | LTU Finland Kolmonen |
– | 2-4 | – | – | L |
| 25/07 | IFK Mariehamn II Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 1-3 | 5 | 3 | L |
| 25/06 | Peimari United Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 2-2 | 5 | 2 | D |
| 17/06 | VG-62 Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 0-3 | 4 | 3 | L |
| 11/06 | JyTy Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 1-0 | 2 | 7 | W |
| 03/06 | KaaPo Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 1-0 | 0 | 0 | W |
| 28/05 | PIF Parainen Finland Kolmonen |
1-1 | 1-3 | 10 | 3 | L |
| 22/05 | MaPS Finland Kolmonen |
– | 2-3 | – | – | L |
| 12/05 | SalPa 2 Finland Kolmonen |
1-0 | 1-2 | 6 | 4 | L |
Frequently asked questions
Who is the favourite in ACF vs PiPS?
According to our model, the most likely result is a ACF win (40%). Probabilities: ACF 40%, draw 24%, PiPS 35%.
How many goals are expected in ACF vs PiPS?
The model expects 3.2 goals (ACF 1.66 · PiPS 1.54), with a 51% chance of under 3.25 goals.
Will both teams score in ACF vs PiPS?
The model gives a 58% chance that both teams score.
What is the most likely score?
The most likely score according to our model is 1-1.