Prediction: Xiamen Feilu vs Beijing Institute
Team pages: Xiamen Feilu · Beijing Institute
| Xiamen Feilu | Draw | Beijing Institute | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Our model | 56% | 26% | 18% |
| Market | 56% | 26% | 18% |
The bar above blends our model with the market: where our probability diverges most from the odds is where the model sees the widest gap.
Match keys
- Cards-heavy: 5.7 🟨 combined avg.
Statistics · 10/10 matches analysed
F = for · A = against · HT = half-time · FT = full-time
| Xiamen Feilu | Beijing Institute | |
|---|---|---|
| Goals for / against (FT) | 0.7 / 1.3 | 1.2 / 2.3 |
| Goals for / against (HT) | 0.4 / 0.4 | 0.3 / 1.1 |
| Half-time result (W/D/L) | 10/80/10% | 0/60/40% |
| Corners (HT / FT) | 2.6 / 4.6 | 0.8 / 3.4 |
| Cards (🟨 / 🟥) | 2.9 / 0 | 2.8 / 0.1 |
Standings · China Division 2 · China League 2 2026, Relegation Round, Group B
Swipe the table sideways →
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tai'an Tiankuang | 23 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 25 | 23 | 32 |
| 2 | Xiamen Feilu | 23 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 29 | 29 | 29 |
| 3 | Qingdao Red Lions | 23 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 23 | 20 | 28 |
| 4 | Nantong Haimen Codion | 23 | 5 | 12 | 6 | 26 | 24 | 27 |
| 5 | Ganzhou Ruishi | 23 | 6 | 8 | 9 | 19 | 33 | 26 |
| 6 | Chengdu Rongcheng Reserves | 23 | 5 | 8 | 10 | 19 | 25 | 23 |
| 7 | Wuhan Three Towns Reserves | 23 | 4 | 8 | 11 | 20 | 26 | 20 |
| 8 | Beijing Institute | 23 | 4 | 7 | 12 | 22 | 42 | 19 |
Common opponents 2 opponents
How each team fared against the same recent opponents
| Opponent | Xiamen Feilu | Beijing Institute |
|---|---|---|
| Qingdao Red Lions | 0-1 L | 1-6 L |
| Ganzhou Ruishi | 0-0 D | 1-0 W |
| Record vs common | 0 W 1 D 1 L | 1 W 0 D 1 L |
Last 10 matches played
The averages above come from these matches. W = win, D = draw, L = loss. Common opponents to both are in blue.
Xiamen Feilu
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13/09 | Qingdao Red Lions China Division 2 |
0-0 | 0-1 | 3 | 4 | L |
| 23/08 | Wenzhou FC China Division 2 |
0-0 | 0-2 | 8 | 1 | L |
| 16/08 | Jiangxi Lushan China Division 2 |
0-0 | 2-0 | 0 | 4 | W |
| 08/08 | Guangzhou Dandelion China Division 2 |
0-0 | 0-0 | 2 | 3 | D |
| 02/08 | Chengdu Rongcheng Reserves China Division 2 |
1-2 | 1-5 | 7 | 0 | L |
| 29/07 | Wuhan Three Towns Reserves China Division 2 |
1-1 | 1-2 | 9 | 3 | L |
| 26/07 | Hangzhou Linping Wuyue China Division 2 |
1-0 | 1-2 | 7 | 4 | L |
| 18/07 | Ganzhou Ruishi China Division 2 |
0-0 | 0-0 | – | – | D |
| 05/07 | Shenzhen 2028 China Division 2 |
0-0 | 0-0 | 2 | 3 | D |
| 27/06 | Guangdong Mingtu China Division 2 |
1-1 | 2-1 | 3 | 4 | W |
Beijing Institute
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12/09 | Ganzhou Ruishi China Division 2 |
0-0 | 1-0 | 5 | 4 | W |
| 22/08 | Dalian Young Boy Reserves China Division 2 |
1-1 | 4-3 | 3 | 4 | W |
| 15/08 | Changchun Xidu China Division 2 |
1-1 | 2-2 | 5 | 3 | D |
| 08/08 | Shanghai Segenda China Division 2 |
0-1 | 2-1 | 4 | 5 | W |
| 05/08 | Lanzhou Longyuan Athletic China Division 2 |
0-0 | 0-1 | 3 | 1 | L |
| 01/08 | Shanxi Chongde Ronghai China Division 2 |
0-1 | 0-2 | 4 | 3 | L |
| 29/07 | Nantong Haimen Codion China Division 2 |
0-0 | 1-2 | 0 | 4 | L |
| 27/07 | Qingdao Red Lions China Division 2 |
0-3 | 1-6 | 4 | 1 | L |
| 18/07 | Dalian Kewei China Division 2 |
0-0 | 0-1 | 3 | 3 | L |
| 04/07 | Shanghai Port Reserves China Division 2 |
1-4 | 1-5 | 3 | 1 | L |
Frequently asked questions
Who is the favourite in Xiamen Feilu vs Beijing Institute?
According to our model, the most likely result is a Xiamen Feilu win (56%). Probabilities: Xiamen Feilu 56%, draw 26%, Beijing Institute 18%.
How many goals are expected in Xiamen Feilu vs Beijing Institute?
The model expects 2.66 goals (Xiamen Feilu 1.76 · Beijing Institute 0.91), with a 55% chance of over 2.25 goals.
Will both teams score in Xiamen Feilu vs Beijing Institute?
The model gives a 52% chance that both teams score.
What is the most likely score?
The most likely score according to our model is 1-1.