Prediction: VG-62 vs ACF
| VG-62 | Draw | ACF | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Our model | 61% | 23% | 17% |
| Market | 62% | 20% | 18% |
The bar above blends our model with the market: where our probability diverges most from the odds is where the model sees the widest gap.
Match keys
- Our model (Elo, opponent-adjusted) favours VG-62 (rating 1512 vs 1438).
- Cards-heavy: 6 🟨 combined avg.
Statistics · 10/10 matches analysed
F = for · A = against · HT = half-time · FT = full-time
| VG-62 | ACF | |
|---|---|---|
| Goals for / against (FT) | 1.4 / 1.2 | 0.8 / 1.9 |
| Goals for / against (HT) | 0.4 / 0.6 | 0.1 / 1 |
| Half-time result (W/D/L) | 25/38/38% | 0/63/38% |
| Corners (HT / FT) | 1.6 / 4.3 | 1.5 / 3.8 |
| Cards (🟨 / 🟥) | 3 / 0.1 | 3 / 0.1 |
Head-to-head (H2H) · VG-62 1–0–0 ACF
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Home | Score | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17/04/26 Finland Kolmonen | ACF | 0-2 HT 0-0 | VG-62 |
Standings · Finland Kolmonen · Kolmonen 2026, Western, Group 1
Swipe the table sideways →
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | IFK Mariehamn II | 11 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 31 | 10 | 27 |
| 2 | EuPa | 11 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 24 | 8 | 25 |
| 3 | PIF Parainen | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 20 | 8 | 20 |
| 4 | KaaPo | 11 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 22 | 20 | 18 |
| 5 | VG-62 | 10 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 14 | 12 | 18 |
| 6 | SalPa 2 | 11 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 15 | 14 | 17 |
| 7 | MaPS | 11 | 5 | 1 | 5 | 19 | 20 | 16 |
| 8 | Peimari United | 11 | 2 | 6 | 3 | 17 | 16 | 12 |
| 9 | LTU | 11 | 3 | 1 | 7 | 8 | 16 | 10 |
| 10 | PiPS | 11 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 9 | 22 | 8 |
| 11 | ACF | 11 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 8 | 21 | 7 |
| 12 | JyTy | 11 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 12 | 32 | 7 |
Common opponents 9 opponents
How each team fared against the same recent opponents
| Opponent | VG-62 | ACF |
|---|---|---|
| LTU | 1-2 L | 0-0 D |
| PiPS | 3-0 W | 0-0 D |
| IFK Mariehamn II | 0-2 L | 1-5 L |
| EuPa | 2-1 W | 0-1 L |
| Peimari United | 1-3 L | 2-2 D |
| JyTy | 1-0 W | 2-0 W |
| KaaPo | 1-3 L | 3-5 L |
| MaPS | 1-0 W | 0-3 L |
| SalPa 2 | 2-1 W | 0-0 D |
| Record vs common | 5 W 0 D 4 L | 1 W 4 D 4 L |
Better against common opponents: VG-62 (5 of 9 head-to-heads won)
Last 10 matches played
The averages above come from these matches. W = win, D = draw, L = loss. Common opponents to both are in blue.
VG-62
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 26/06 | LTU Finland Kolmonen |
0-2 | 1-2 | 6 | 3 | L |
| 17/06 | PiPS Finland Kolmonen |
1-0 | 3-0 | 2 | 3 | W |
| 13/06 | IFK Mariehamn II Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 0-2 | 2 | 2 | L |
| 05/06 | EuPa Finland Kolmonen |
0-1 | 2-1 | 5 | 4 | W |
| 29/05 | Peimari United Finland Kolmonen |
– | 1-3 | – | – | L |
| 22/05 | JyTy Finland Kolmonen |
1-0 | 1-0 | 2 | 4 | W |
| 14/05 | KaaPo Finland Kolmonen |
1-1 | 1-3 | 3 | 5 | L |
| 02/05 | MaPS Finland Kolmonen |
– | 1-0 | – | – | W |
| 24/04 | SalPa 2 Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 2-1 | 6 | 4 | W |
| 17/04 | ACF Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 2-0 | 8 | 0 | W |
ACF
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25/06 | JyTy Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 2-0 | 4 | 4 | W |
| 17/06 | Peimari United Finland Kolmonen |
1-1 | 2-2 | 6 | 3 | D |
| 12/06 | KaaPo Finland Kolmonen |
0-2 | 3-5 | 3 | 1 | L |
| 05/06 | PIF Parainen Finland Kolmonen |
0-2 | 0-3 | 5 | 2 | L |
| 29/05 | MaPS Finland Kolmonen |
0-3 | 0-3 | 4 | 3 | L |
| 22/05 | SalPa 2 Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 0-0 | 4 | 4 | D |
| 14/05 | EuPa Finland Kolmonen |
– | 0-1 | – | – | L |
| 08/05 | PiPS Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 0-0 | 3 | 5 | D |
| 29/04 | LTU Finland Kolmonen |
0-0 | 0-0 | 1 | 3 | D |
| 25/04 | IFK Mariehamn II Finland Kolmonen |
– | 1-5 | – | – | L |
Frequently asked questions
Who is the favourite in VG-62 vs ACF?
According to our model, the most likely result is a VG-62 win (62%). Probabilities: VG-62 62%, draw 21%, ACF 17%.
How many goals are expected in VG-62 vs ACF?
The model expects 3.06 goals (VG-62 2.06 · ACF 1), with a 57% chance of under 3.5 goals.
Will both teams score in VG-62 vs ACF?
The model gives a 54% chance that both teams score.
What is the most likely score?
The most likely score according to our model is 1-1.