Prediction: MuSa vs AIFK

Team pages: MuSa · AIFK

Prediction summary
Expected goals
3.57Total
MuSa0.84
AIFK2.73
1X2
8% 16% 76%
MuSa Draw AIFK
Markets
Under 3.5 goals 52% Both teams to score 53%
Most likely score
0-2
Recent form · 10 last
MuSa 2-2-6 (W-D-L)
LLDWDLWLLL
AIFK 6-2-2 (W-D-L)
DWWWLWDWWL
Head-to-head
MuSa 2–2–2 AIFK (6 last)
  • AIFK4-2MuSa
  • AIFK0-2MuSa
  • MuSa0-0AIFK
  • AIFK3-2MuSa
  • MuSa1-1AIFK
  • AIFK1-2MuSa
Our model (Elo) vs Market Rating Elo · MuSa 1451 · AIFK 1547
MuSaDrawAIFK
Our model8%15%76%
Market8%16%76%
Estimated total (ours) 3.57 goals · Bet365 line 3.75 · -0.2

The bar above blends our model with the market: where our probability diverges most from the odds is where the model sees the widest gap.

Model analysis
1st-half goalsOver 1.5 · 70%model estimate

Match keys

  • Our model (Elo, opponent-adjusted) favours AIFK (rating 1451 vs 1547).
  • Cards-heavy: 6.9 🟨 combined avg.

Statistics · 10/10 matches analysed

F = for · A = against · HT = half-time · FT = full-time

MuSaAIFK
Goals for / against (FT)1.4 / 2.91.9 / 0.9
Goals for / against (HT)1.1 / 1.10.8 / 0.7
Half-time result (W/D/L)40/10/50%30/40/30%
Corners (HT / FT)1.1 / 23 / 6.2
Cards (🟨 / 🟥)2.7 / 0.24.2 / 0.3

Head-to-head (H2H) · MuSa 222 AIFK

Swipe the table sideways →

DateHomeScoreAway
29/05/26
Finland Kakkonen Group B
AIFK4-2
HT 1-2
MuSa
20/09/24
Finland Kolmonen
AIFK0-2
HT 0-0
MuSa
07/06/24
Finland Kolmonen
MuSa0-0
HT 0-0
AIFK
21/06/23
Finland Kolmonen
AIFK3-2
HT 2-1
MuSa
03/10/15
Finland Kakkonen Group B
MuSa1-1
HT 0-0
AIFK
05/08/15
Finland Kakkonen Group B
AIFK1-2
HT 0-0
MuSa

Standings · Finland Kakkonen Group B · Kakkonen 2026, Group B

Swipe the table sideways →

#Team PWDL GFGAPts
1 FC Honka 151041 441534
2 AIFK 151032 321333
3 HJS 15843 272028
4 Tampereen Ilves 2 15762 442427
5 P-Iirot 15735 252024
6 EPS 15726 292323
7 GrIFK 15537 192718
8 EBK 15339 223612
9 MuSa 152310 16489
10 NJS 150114 9411

Common opponents 8 opponents

How each team fared against the same recent opponents

OpponentMuSaAIFK
Tampereen Ilves 2 0-7 L 1-1 D
EPS 0-2 L 2-1 W
HJS 1-2 L 0-1 L
GrIFK 3-1 W 1-0 W
FC Honka 1-7 L 0-1 L
P-Iirot 2-2 D 2-0 W
EBK 2-0 W 6-1 W
NJS 0-0 D 2-1 W
Record vs common 2 W 2 D 4 L 5 W 1 D 2 L

Better against common opponents: AIFK (6 of 8 head-to-heads won)

Last 10 matches played

The averages above come from these matches. W = win, D = draw, L = loss. Common opponents to both are in blue.

MuSa

LLDWDLWLLL

Swipe the table sideways →

Date Opponent HT FT Cor.Cards Res.
04/08 Tampereen Ilves 2
Finland Kakkonen Group B
0-1 0-7 41 L
25/07 EPS
Finland Kakkonen Group B
0-1 0-2 03 L
18/07 HJS
Finland Kakkonen Group B
1-2 1-2 74 L
09/07 GrIFK
Finland Kakkonen Group B
1-0 3-1 33 W
04/07 FC Honka
Finland Kakkonen Group B
1-3 1-7 13 L
27/06 P-Iirot
Finland Kakkonen Group B
1-2 2-2 15 D
12/06 EBK
Finland Kakkonen Group B
2-0 2-0 12 W
05/06 NJS
Finland Kakkonen Group B
0-0 0-0 25 D
29/05 AIFK
Finland Kakkonen Group B
2-1 2-4 12 L
23/05 Tampereen Ilves 2
Finland Kakkonen Group B
3-1 3-4 01 L

AIFK

DWWWLWDWWL

Swipe the table sideways →

Date Opponent HT FT Cor.Cards Res.
31/07 HJS
Finland Kakkonen Group B
0-0 0-1 53 L
24/07 NJS
Finland Kakkonen Group B
0-1 2-1 65 W
17/07 GrIFK
Finland Kakkonen Group B
1-0 1-0 67 W
10/07 Tampereen Ilves 2
Finland Kakkonen Group B
0-1 1-1 64 D
02/07 EBK
Finland Kakkonen Group B
3-1 6-1 34 W
26/06 FC Honka
Finland Kakkonen Group B
0-0 0-1 77 L
13/06 EPS
Finland Kakkonen Group B
1-1 2-1 47 W
04/06 P-Iirot
Finland Kakkonen Group B
1-0 2-0 53 W
29/05 MuSa
Finland Kakkonen Group B
1-2 4-2 122 W
23/05 HJS
Finland Kakkonen Group B
1-1 1-1 83 D

Frequently asked questions

Who is the favourite in MuSa vs AIFK?

According to our model, the most likely result is an AIFK win (76%). Probabilities: MuSa 8%, draw 16%, AIFK 76%.

How many goals are expected in MuSa vs AIFK?

The model expects 3.57 goals (MuSa 0.84 · AIFK 2.73), with a 55% chance of under 3.75 goals.

Will both teams score in MuSa vs AIFK?

The model gives a 53% chance that both teams score.

What is the most likely score?

The most likely score according to our model is 0-2.