Prediction: AIFK vs EPS
- EPS1-2AIFK
| AIFK | Draw | EPS | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Our model | 57% | 23% | 20% |
| Market | 58% | 21% | 21% |
The bar above blends our model with the market: where our probability diverges most from the odds is where the model sees the widest gap.
Match keys
- High corners: 10.9 combined avg.
- Cards-heavy: 8.2 🟨 combined avg.
Statistics · 10/10 matches analysed
F = for · A = against · HT = half-time · FT = full-time
| AIFK | EPS | |
|---|---|---|
| Goals for / against (FT) | 2 / 0.9 | 2.3 / 1.6 |
| Goals for / against (HT) | 0.8 / 0.7 | 1 / 0.9 |
| Half-time result (W/D/L) | 30/40/30% | 40/30/30% |
| Corners (HT / FT) | 3.3 / 6.3 | 2 / 4.6 |
| Cards (🟨 / 🟥) | 4.3 / 0.3 | 3.9 / 0.4 |
Head-to-head (H2H) · AIFK 1–0–0 EPS
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Home | Score | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| 13/06/26 Finland Kakkonen Group B | EPS | 1-2 HT 1-1 | AIFK |
Standings · Finland Kakkonen Group B · Kakkonen 2026, Group B
Swipe the table sideways →
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FC Honka | 16 | 11 | 4 | 1 | 51 | 15 | 37 |
| 2 | AIFK | 16 | 11 | 3 | 2 | 34 | 14 | 36 |
| 3 | HJS | 16 | 9 | 4 | 3 | 30 | 21 | 31 |
| 4 | Tampereen Ilves 2 | 16 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 45 | 27 | 27 |
| 5 | P-Iirot | 16 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 27 | 20 | 27 |
| 6 | EPS | 16 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 34 | 24 | 26 |
| 7 | GrIFK | 16 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 19 | 29 | 18 |
| 8 | EBK | 16 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 23 | 41 | 12 |
| 9 | MuSa | 16 | 2 | 3 | 11 | 17 | 50 | 9 |
| 10 | NJS | 16 | 0 | 1 | 15 | 9 | 48 | 1 |
Common opponents 8 opponents
How each team fared against the same recent opponents
| Opponent | AIFK | EPS |
|---|---|---|
| MuSa | 2-1 W | 2-0 W |
| HJS | 0-1 L | 3-1 W |
| NJS | 2-1 W | 2-1 W |
| GrIFK | 1-0 W | 1-3 L |
| Tampereen Ilves 2 | 1-1 D | 2-4 L |
| EBK | 6-1 W | 5-1 W |
| FC Honka | 0-1 L | 3-2 W |
| P-Iirot | 2-0 W | 2-0 W |
| Record vs common | 5 W 1 D 2 L | 6 W 0 D 2 L |
Last 10 matches played
The averages above come from these matches. W = win, D = draw, L = loss. Common opponents to both are in blue.
AIFK
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/08 | MuSa Finland Kakkonen Group B |
1-1 | 2-1 | 9 | 4 | W |
| 31/07 | HJS Finland Kakkonen Group B |
0-0 | 0-1 | 5 | 3 | L |
| 24/07 | NJS Finland Kakkonen Group B |
0-1 | 2-1 | 6 | 5 | W |
| 17/07 | GrIFK Finland Kakkonen Group B |
1-0 | 1-0 | 6 | 7 | W |
| 10/07 | Tampereen Ilves 2 Finland Kakkonen Group B |
0-1 | 1-1 | 6 | 4 | D |
| 02/07 | EBK Finland Kakkonen Group B |
3-1 | 6-1 | 3 | 4 | W |
| 26/06 | FC Honka Finland Kakkonen Group B |
0-0 | 0-1 | 7 | 7 | L |
| 13/06 | EPS Finland Kakkonen Group B |
1-1 | 2-1 | 4 | 7 | W |
| 04/06 | P-Iirot Finland Kakkonen Group B |
1-0 | 2-0 | 5 | 3 | W |
| 29/05 | MuSa Finland Kakkonen Group B |
1-2 | 4-2 | 12 | 2 | W |
EPS
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 08/08 | EBK Finland Kakkonen Group B |
2-0 | 5-1 | 4 | 5 | W |
| 01/08 | FC Honka Finland Kakkonen Group B |
2-1 | 3-2 | 3 | 4 | W |
| 25/07 | MuSa Finland Kakkonen Group B |
1-0 | 2-0 | 6 | 3 | W |
| 18/07 | NJS Finland Kakkonen Group B |
0-1 | 2-1 | 3 | 2 | W |
| 11/07 | P-Iirot Finland Kakkonen Group B |
1-0 | 2-0 | 6 | 4 | W |
| 05/07 | Tampereen Ilves 2 Finland Kakkonen Group B |
1-3 | 2-4 | 6 | 5 | L |
| 27/06 | GrIFK Finland Kakkonen Group B |
0-1 | 1-3 | 7 | 3 | L |
| 13/06 | AIFK Finland Kakkonen Group B |
1-1 | 1-2 | 3 | 7 | L |
| 06/06 | HJS Finland Kakkonen Group B |
1-1 | 3-1 | 4 | 5 | W |
| 29/05 | EBK Finland Kakkonen Group B |
1-1 | 2-2 | 4 | 5 | D |
Frequently asked questions
Who is the favourite in AIFK vs EPS?
According to our model, the most likely result is a AIFK win (57%). Probabilities: AIFK 57%, draw 22%, EPS 21%.
How many goals are expected in AIFK vs EPS?
The model expects 3.3 goals (AIFK 2.09 · EPS 1.2), with a 50% chance of over 3.25 goals.
Will both teams score in AIFK vs EPS?
The model gives a 57% chance that both teams score.
What is the most likely score?
The most likely score according to our model is 1-1.

