Prediction: Charlottenlund SK vs Kragero
Team pages: Charlottenlund SK · Kragero
- Kragero24-34Charlottenlund SK
- Charlottenlund SK32-37Kragero
| Charlottenlund SK | Kragero | |
|---|---|---|
| Our model | 82% | 18% |
| Market | 84% | 10% |
The bar above blends our model with the market: where our probability diverges most from the odds is where the model sees the widest gap.
Match keys
- Our model (Elo, opponent-adjusted) favours Charlottenlund SK (rating 1594 vs 1400).
- Charlottenlund SK is a clear favourite (87% market).
Statistics · 10/10 matches analysed
| Charlottenlund SK | Kragero | |
|---|---|---|
| Points F|A (Last 10) | 33.8 / 28.7 | 26.6 / 34.6 |
| Points F|A (Last 5) | 37 / 30 | 28.2 / 33.2 |
| Est. result | 36 | 27 |
The points split reflects each team's scoring pace; the win probability also factors in home-court advantage.
Head-to-head (H2H) · Charlottenlund SK 1–0–1 Kragero
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Home | Score | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18/01/26 Norway 1st Division | Kragero | 24-34 | Charlottenlund SK |
| 31/08/25 Norway 1st Division | Charlottenlund SK | 32-37 | Kragero |
Standings · Norway 1st Division
Swipe the table sideways →
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Halden | 8 | 8 | 0 | 0 | 265 | 209 | 16 |
| 2 | Charlottenlund SK | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 277 | 228 | 14 |
| 3 | Nordstrand | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 258 | 213 | 13 |
| 4 | Melhus | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 255 | 231 | 12 |
| 5 | Bodø HK | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 230 | 196 | 12 |
| 6 | Haslum HK | 8 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 254 | 227 | 12 |
| 7 | Bækkelaget | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 249 | 218 | 10 |
| 8 | Notteroy | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 256 | 236 | 9 |
| 9 | Lillestrom HK | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 235 | 257 | 4 |
| 10 | Varhaug | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 230 | 255 | 4 |
| 11 | Asane | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 216 | 243 | 4 |
| 12 | Ryger Stavanger | 8 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 204 | 246 | 2 |
| 13 | Kragero | 9 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 240 | 302 | 2 |
| 14 | Tiller IL | 9 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 232 | 340 | 0 |
Common opponents 5 opponents
How each team fared against the same recent opponents
| Opponent | Charlottenlund SK | Kragero |
|---|---|---|
| Lillestrom HK | 39-26 W | 24-35 L |
| Tiller IL | 42-32 W | 38-28 W |
| Melhus | 37-33 W | 29-35 L |
| Asane | 39-23 W | 26-35 L |
| Nordstrand | 30-29 W | 23-33 L |
| Record vs common | 5 W 0 D 0 L | 1 W 0 D 4 L |
Better against common opponents: Charlottenlund SK (4 of 5 head-to-heads won)
Last 10 matches played
The averages above come from these matches. W = win, D = draw, L = loss. Common opponents to both are in blue.
Charlottenlund SK
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | FT | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24/10 | Lillestrom HK Norway 1st Division |
39-26 | W |
| 18/10 | Tiller IL Norway 1st Division |
42-32 | W |
| 14/10 | Melhus Norway 1st Division |
37-33 | W |
| 30/09 | Varhaug Norway 1st Division |
31-30 | W |
| 27/09 | Ryger Stavanger Norway 1st Division |
36-29 | W |
| 23/09 | Bodø HK Norway 1st Division |
23-26 | L |
| 13/09 | Asane Norway 1st Division |
39-23 | W |
| 30/08 | Nordstrand Norway 1st Division |
30-29 | W |
| 12/04 | Bodø HK Norway 1st Division |
31-30 | W |
| 08/04 | Melhus Norway 1st Division |
30-29 | W |
Kragero
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | FT | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25/10 | Melhus Norway 1st Division |
29-35 | L |
| 18/10 | Nordstrand Norway 1st Division |
23-33 | L |
| 11/10 | Tiller IL Norway 1st Division |
38-28 | W |
| 07/10 | Lillestrom HK Norway 1st Division |
24-35 | L |
| 03/10 | Haslum HK Norway 1st Division |
27-35 | L |
| 27/09 | Bækkelaget Norway 1st Division |
24-28 | L |
| 20/09 | Halden Norway 1st Division |
24-41 | L |
| 13/09 | Notteroy Norway 1st Division |
25-32 | L |
| 06/09 | Asane Norway 1st Division |
26-35 | L |
| 12/04 | Bergsoy Norway 1st Division |
26-44 | L |
Frequently asked questions
Who is the favourite in Charlottenlund SK vs Kragero?
Our model gives 87% to Charlottenlund SK.
How many points are expected in Charlottenlund SK vs Kragero?
The model estimates 62.7 total points (Charlottenlund SK 35.6 · Kragero 27.1).
Over or under 60.5 points?
Recent history points to over 60.5 points (65%).

