Prediction: Flint City Bucks vs Ventura County Fusion
Team pages: Flint City Bucks · Ventura County Fusion
- Ventura County Fusion1-0Flint City Bucks
| Flint City Bucks | Draw | Ventura County Fusion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Our model | 55% | 22% | 23% |
| Market | 56% | 21% | 23% |
The bar above blends our model with the market: where our probability diverges most from the odds is where the model sees the widest gap.
Match keys
- Cards-heavy: 8.1 🟨 combined avg.
Statistics · 10/10 matches analysed
F = for · A = against · HT = half-time · FT = full-time
| Flint City Bucks | Ventura County Fusion | |
|---|---|---|
| Goals for / against (FT) | 2.8 / 0.9 | 3.4 / 1 |
| Goals for / against (HT) | 1.3 / 0.3 | 1.3 / 0.5 |
| Half-time result (W/D/L) | 70/20/10% | 60/20/20% |
| Corners (HT / FT) | 1.8 / 5.4 | 2.5 / 4.5 |
| Cards (🟨 / 🟥) | 4.6 / 0.2 | 3.5 / 0 |
Head-to-head (H2H) · Flint City Bucks 0–0–1 Ventura County Fusion
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Home | Score | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| 01/08/22 USA USL League Two | Ventura County Fusion | 1-0 HT 1-0 | Flint City Bucks |
Standings · USA USL League Two · USL League Two 2026, Southwest Division
Swipe the table sideways →
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ventura County Fusion | 12 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 34 | 10 | 28 |
| 2 | Redlands FC | 12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 25 | 15 | 22 |
| 3 | FC Tucson | 12 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 19 | 11 | 22 |
| 4 | Capo FC II | 12 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 29 | 27 | 18 |
| 5 | Stars FC | 12 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 22 | 22 | 16 |
| 6 | City SC San Diego | 12 | 5 | 0 | 7 | 23 | 27 | 15 |
| 7 | Southern California Eagles | 12 | 3 | 2 | 7 | 17 | 29 | 11 |
| 8 | AMSG FC | 12 | 0 | 1 | 11 | 11 | 39 | 1 |
Last 10 matches played
The averages above come from these matches. W = win, D = draw, L = loss. Common opponents to both are in blue.
Flint City Bucks
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 25/07 | Peoria City USA USL League Two |
1-0 | 4-0 | 2 | 9 | W |
| 20/07 | Steel City USA USL League Two |
1-0 | 2-1 | 2 | 3 | W |
| 18/07 | FC Buffalo USA USL League Two |
1-0 | 2-0 | 4 | 6 | W |
| 12/07 | Union FC Macomb USA USL League Two |
3-0 | 4-1 | – | – | W |
| 06/07 | Lansing City Football USA USL League Two |
3-1 | 6-2 | 9 | 2 | W |
| 04/07 | Kalamazoo FC USA USL League Two |
0-0 | 2-0 | – | – | W |
| 01/07 | Midwest United USA USL League Two |
2-1 | 4-1 | – | – | W |
| 28/06 | Oakland County FC USA USL League Two |
0-0 | 1-1 | – | – | D |
| 25/06 | AFC Ann Arbor USA USL League Two |
0-1 | 1-2 | 10 | 4 | L |
| 14/06 | Oakland County FC USA USL League Two |
2-0 | 2-1 | – | – | W |
Ventura County Fusion
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24/07 | Ballard FC USA USL League Two |
2-1 | 2-1 | – | – | W |
| 20/07 | San Francisco City FC USA USL League Two |
0-1 | 6-1 | – | – | W |
| 18/07 | Project 51O USA USL League Two |
0-0 | 1-0 | 5 | 3 | W |
| 12/07 | Redlands FC USA USL League Two |
1-0 | 1-1 | – | – | D |
| 09/07 | Stars FC USA USL League Two |
3-1 | 4-3 | – | – | W |
| 04/07 | AMSG FC USA USL League Two |
2-0 | 6-0 | – | – | W |
| 01/07 | FC Tucson USA USL League Two |
1-0 | 2-1 | – | – | W |
| 25/06 | Southern California Eagles USA USL League Two |
3-0 | 5-1 | – | – | W |
| 21/06 | FC Tucson USA USL League Two |
1-2 | 2-2 | 4 | 4 | D |
| 18/06 | AMSG FC USA USL League Two |
0-0 | 5-0 | – | – | W |
Frequently asked questions
Who is the favourite in Flint City Bucks vs Ventura County Fusion?
According to our model, the most likely result is a Flint City Bucks win (55%). Probabilities: Flint City Bucks 55%, draw 22%, Ventura County Fusion 23%.
How many goals are expected in Flint City Bucks vs Ventura County Fusion?
The model expects 3.62 goals (Flint City Bucks 2.22 · Ventura County Fusion 1.4), with a 52% chance of under 3.5 goals.
Will both teams score in Flint City Bucks vs Ventura County Fusion?
The model gives a 59% chance that both teams score.
What is the most likely score?
The most likely score according to our model is 2-1.