Prediction: Al Nairyah vs Al Sahel
Team pages: Al Nairyah · Al Sahel
Match keys
- Our model (Elo, opponent-adjusted) favours Al Sahel (rating 1518 vs 1577).
- Cards-heavy: 10.5 🟨 combined avg.
Statistics · 10/10 matches analysed
F = for · A = against · HT = half-time · FT = full-time
| Al Nairyah | Al Sahel | |
|---|---|---|
| Goals for / against (FT) | 1.7 / 1.5 | 1.9 / 0.7 |
| Goals for / against (HT) | 2 / 1 | 1 / 0 |
| Half-time result (W/D/L) | 100/0/0% | 100/0/0% |
| Corners (HT / FT) | 2 / 5 | 2 / 2.5 |
| Cards (🟨 / 🟥) | 5 / 0 | 5.5 / 0.5 |
Standings · Saudi Arabia Division 2 · Second Division 26/27, Group 1
Swipe the table sideways →
| # | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Al Sahel | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 5 | 13 |
| 2 | Weg Taif SC | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 5 | 11 |
| 3 | Al Qala'a | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 10 |
| 4 | Baish | 5 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 7 | 10 |
| 5 | Al Ain FC | 4 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 2 | 9 |
| 6 | Al Safa | 5 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 8 | 9 |
| 7 | Al Taraji | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 9 | 12 | 8 |
| 8 | Al Qwarah | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 9 | 7 |
| 9 | Arar FC | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 7 |
| 10 | Al-Qotah | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 9 | 5 |
| 11 | Al Rayyan Ar Rawdah | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 8 | 5 |
| 12 | Al Nairyah | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 7 | 4 |
| 13 | Afif | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 9 | 4 |
| 14 | Al Batin | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 3 |
| 15 | Mudhar FC | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 2 |
| 16 | Hottain | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 0 |
Common opponents 4 opponents
How each team fared against the same recent opponents
| Opponent | Al Nairyah | Al Sahel |
|---|---|---|
| Al Taraji | 3-4 L | 0-1 L |
| Mudhar FC | 2-2 D | 2-0 W |
| Weg Taif SC | 0-1 L | 2-2 D |
| Al-Qotah | 3-1 W | 2-0 W |
| Record vs common | 1 W 1 D 2 L | 2 W 1 D 1 L |
Better against common opponents: Al Sahel (2 of 4 head-to-heads won)
Last 10 matches played
The averages above come from these matches. W = win, D = draw, L = loss. Common opponents to both are in blue.
Al Nairyah
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 02/11 | Afif Saudi Arabia Division 2 |
– | 2-0 | – | – | W |
| 28/10 | Al Taraji Saudi Arabia Division 2 |
2-1 | 3-4 | 5 | 5 | L |
| 24/10 | Mudhar FC Saudi Arabia Division 2 |
– | 2-2 | – | – | D |
| 09/10 | Weg Taif SC Saudi Arabia Division 2 |
– | 0-1 | – | – | L |
| 07/04 | Al-Qotah Saudi Arabia Division 2 |
– | 3-1 | – | – | W |
| 04/04 | Al Kawkab Saudi Arabia Division 2 |
– | 1-1 | – | – | D |
| 27/03 | Al Qous Saudi Arabia Division 2 |
– | 3-2 | – | – | W |
| 13/03 | Arar FC Saudi Arabia Division 2 |
– | 3-2 | – | – | W |
| 06/03 | Al-Saqer FC Saudi Arabia Division 2 |
– | 0-2 | – | – | L |
| 28/02 | Bisha FC Saudi Arabia Division 2 |
– | 0-0 | – | – | D |
Al Sahel
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | HT | FT | Cor. | Cards | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 07/11 | Mudhar FC Saudi Arabia Division 2 |
– | 2-0 | – | – | W |
| 02/11 | Al Qwarah Saudi Arabia Division 2 |
– | 3-2 | – | – | W |
| 28/10 | Al-Qotah Saudi Arabia Division 2 |
– | 2-0 | – | – | W |
| 23/10 | Al Rayyan Ar Rawdah Saudi Arabia Division 2 |
– | 1-0 | – | – | W |
| 16/10 | Weg Taif SC Saudi Arabia Division 2 |
– | 2-2 | – | – | D |
| 09/10 | Al Taraji Saudi Arabia Division 2 |
– | 0-1 | – | – | L |
| 10/04 | Al-Sadd FC Saudi Arabia Division 2 |
– | 4-0 | – | – | W |
| 04/04 | Jerash Saudi Arabia Division 2 |
– | 2-1 | – | – | W |
| 28/03 | Najran SC Saudi Arabia Division 2 |
1-0 | 2-0 | 3 | 5 | W |
| 24/03 | Jubbah Saudi Arabia Division 2 |
1-0 | 1-1 | 2 | 7 | D |
Frequently asked questions
Who is the favourite in Al Nairyah vs Al Sahel?
According to our model, the most likely result is an Al Sahel win (37%). Probabilities: Al Nairyah 36%, draw 28%, Al Sahel 37%.
How many goals are expected in Al Nairyah vs Al Sahel?
The model expects 2.79 goals (Al Nairyah 1.38 · Al Sahel 1.41), with a 53% chance of under 2.75 goals.
Will both teams score in Al Nairyah vs Al Sahel?
The model gives a 55% chance that both teams score.
What is the most likely score?
The most likely score according to our model is 1-1.

