Prediction: SZTE-Szedeak vs DEAC Debreceni
Team pages: SZTE-Szedeak · DEAC Debreceni
- SZTE-Szedeak72-83DEAC Debreceni
- DEAC Debreceni97-66SZTE-Szedeak
- DEAC Debreceni73-51SZTE-Szedeak
- SZTE-Szedeak74-85DEAC Debreceni
- SZTE-Szedeak76-74DEAC Debreceni
- SZTE-Szedeak91-96DEAC Debreceni
Match keys
- Our model (Elo, opponent-adjusted) favours SZTE-Szedeak (rating 1513 vs 1430).
- SZTE-Szedeak is a clear favourite (73% market).
- H2H favours DEAC Debreceni: 5-1.
Statistics · 10/10 matches analysed
| SZTE-Szedeak | DEAC Debreceni | |
|---|---|---|
| Points F|A (Last 10) | 81.5 / 80.6 | 81.2 / 89.5 |
| Points F|A (Last 5) | 80.8 / 79 | 85.8 / 93.2 |
| Est. result | 86 | 78 |
The points split reflects each team's scoring pace; the win probability also factors in home-court advantage.
Head-to-head (H2H) · SZTE-Szedeak 1–0–5 DEAC Debreceni
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Home | Score | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11/04/26 Hungary NB 1.A | SZTE-Szedeak | 72-83 | DEAC Debreceni |
| 20/12/25 Hungary NB 1.A | DEAC Debreceni | 97-66 | SZTE-Szedeak |
| 05/04/25 Hungary NB 1.A | DEAC Debreceni | 73-51 | SZTE-Szedeak |
| 13/12/24 Hungary NB 1.A | SZTE-Szedeak | 74-85 | DEAC Debreceni |
| 11/09/24 Club Friendlies | SZTE-Szedeak | 76-74 | DEAC Debreceni |
| 30/03/24 Hungary NB 1.A | SZTE-Szedeak | 91-96 | DEAC Debreceni |
Standings · Hungary NB 1.A
Swipe the table sideways →
| # | Team | P | W | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kaposvari | 5 | 4 | 1 | 467 | 447 | 9 |
| 2 | Falco Szombathely | 4 | 4 | 0 | 394 | 292 | 8 |
| 3 | Atomeromu | 4 | 4 | 0 | 418 | 322 | 8 |
| 4 | Szolnoki Olaj | 5 | 3 | 2 | 443 | 414 | 8 |
| 5 | Budapesti Honved SE | 4 | 3 | 1 | 352 | 353 | 7 |
| 6 | Alba Fehervar | 4 | 3 | 1 | 376 | 339 | 7 |
| 7 | SZTE-Szedeak | 4 | 2 | 2 | 326 | 329 | 6 |
| 8 | PHOENIX-MT Fot | 4 | 2 | 2 | 325 | 318 | 6 |
| 9 | Sopron KC | 4 | 2 | 2 | 343 | 361 | 6 |
| 10 | Kormend | 4 | 1 | 3 | 332 | 376 | 5 |
| 11 | OSE Lions | 4 | 1 | 3 | 342 | 378 | 5 |
| 12 | DEAC Debreceni | 4 | 0 | 4 | 341 | 376 | 4 |
| 13 | NKA Pecs | 4 | 0 | 4 | 309 | 375 | 4 |
| 14 | Kecskemeti TE | 4 | 0 | 4 | 269 | 357 | 4 |
Common opponents 2 opponents
How each team fared against the same recent opponents
| Opponent | SZTE-Szedeak | DEAC Debreceni |
|---|---|---|
| PHOENIX-MT Fot | 77-71 W | 81-88 L |
| Kaposvari | 98-99 L | 90-95 L |
| Record vs common | 1 W 0 D 1 L | 0 W 0 D 2 L |
Better against common opponents: SZTE-Szedeak (2 of 2 head-to-heads won)
Last 10 matches played
The averages above come from these matches. W = win, D = draw, L = loss. Common opponents to both are in blue.
SZTE-Szedeak
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | FT | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20/10 | Kecskemeti TE Hungary NB 1.A |
86-63 | W |
| 10/10 | Falco Szombathely Hungary NB 1.A |
65-96 | L |
| 03/10 | PHOENIX-MT Fot Hungary NB 1.A |
77-71 | W |
| 26/09 | Kaposvari Hungary NB 1.A |
98-99 | L |
| 23/05 | ZTE KK Hungary NB 1.A |
78-66 | W |
| 20/05 | OSE Lions Hungary NB 1.A |
84-102 | L |
| 16/05 | NKA Pecs Hungary NB 1.A |
77-69 | W |
| 13/05 | Kecskemeti TE Hungary NB 1.A |
63-68 | L |
| 09/05 | Kormend Hungary NB 1.A |
90-82 | W |
| 02/05 | ZTE KK Hungary NB 1.A |
97-90 | W |
DEAC Debreceni
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | FT | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17/10 | PHOENIX-MT Fot Hungary NB 1.A |
81-88 | L |
| 10/10 | Kaposvari Hungary NB 1.A |
90-95 | L |
| 02/10 | Budapesti Honved SE Hungary NB 1.A |
88-93 | L |
| 25/09 | Sopron KC Hungary NB 1.A |
82-100 | L |
| 14/05 | Sopron KC Hungary NB 1.A |
88-90 | L |
| 12/05 | Sopron KC Hungary NB 1.A |
89-93 | L |
| 09/05 | Sopron KC Hungary NB 1.A |
79-72 | W |
| 06/05 | Budapesti Honved SE Hungary NB 1.A |
70-92 | L |
| 03/05 | Budapesti Honved SE Hungary NB 1.A |
67-70 | L |
| 29/04 | Kaposvari Hungary NB 1.A |
78-102 | L |
Frequently asked questions
Who is the favourite in SZTE-Szedeak vs DEAC Debreceni?
Our model gives 73% to SZTE-Szedeak.
How many points are expected in SZTE-Szedeak vs DEAC Debreceni?
The model estimates 164.3 total points (SZTE-Szedeak 86.4 · DEAC Debreceni 77.8).

