Prediction: Sokol Pisek vs NH Ostrava
Team pages: Sokol Pisek · NH Ostrava
- Sokol Pisek104-81NH Ostrava
- NH Ostrava71-99Sokol Pisek
- NH Ostrava101-105Sokol Pisek
- Sokol Pisek84-77NH Ostrava
- Sokol Pisek89-78NH Ostrava
- NH Ostrava88-97Sokol Pisek
| Sokol Pisek | NH Ostrava | |
|---|---|---|
| Our model | 66% | 34% |
| Market | 71% | 29% |
The bar above blends our model with the market: where our probability diverges most from the odds is where the model sees the widest gap.
Match keys
- Sokol Pisek is a clear favourite (70% market).
- H2H favours Sokol Pisek: 6-0.
Statistics · 10/10 matches analysed
| Sokol Pisek | NH Ostrava | |
|---|---|---|
| Points F|A (Last 10) | 83.9 / 86.9 | 81.6 / 91.6 |
| Points F|A (Last 5) | 90 / 88.6 | 87.4 / 84.4 |
| Est. result | 91 | 84 |
The points split reflects each team's scoring pace; the win probability also factors in home-court advantage.
Head-to-head (H2H) · Sokol Pisek 6–0–0 NH Ostrava
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Home | Score | Away |
|---|---|---|---|
| 29/03/26 Czechia NBL | Sokol Pisek | 104-81 | NH Ostrava |
| 07/02/26 Czechia NBL | NH Ostrava | 71-99 | Sokol Pisek |
| 15/11/25 Czechia NBL | NH Ostrava | 101-105 | Sokol Pisek |
| 28/09/25 Czechia NBL | Sokol Pisek | 84-77 | NH Ostrava |
| 17/11/24 Czechia NBL | Sokol Pisek | 89-78 | NH Ostrava |
| 25/09/24 Czechia NBL | NH Ostrava | 88-97 | Sokol Pisek |
Standings · Czechia NBL
Swipe the table sideways →
| # | Team | P | W | L | GF | GA | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Slavia Praha ERA NBK | 6 | 6 | 0 | 604 | 454 | 0 |
| 2 | BK JIP Pardubice | 6 | 5 | 1 | 535 | 496 | 0 |
| 3 | Usti Nad Labem | 5 | 4 | 1 | 451 | 378 | 0 |
| 4 | BK Decin | 6 | 4 | 2 | 514 | 447 | 0 |
| 5 | NH Ostrava | 5 | 3 | 2 | 437 | 422 | 0 |
| 6 | Sokol Pisek | 5 | 3 | 2 | 450 | 443 | 0 |
| 7 | BK Opava | 6 | 3 | 3 | 506 | 535 | 0 |
| 8 | USK Praha | 6 | 2 | 4 | 494 | 518 | 0 |
| 9 | GAPA Hradec Kralove | 6 | 2 | 4 | 514 | 563 | 0 |
| 10 | BK Olomoucko | 5 | 1 | 4 | 325 | 433 | 0 |
| 11 | Brno | 5 | 0 | 5 | 397 | 447 | 0 |
| 12 | Lokomotiva Plzen | 5 | 0 | 5 | 397 | 488 | 0 |
Common opponents 2 opponents
How each team fared against the same recent opponents
| Opponent | Sokol Pisek | NH Ostrava |
|---|---|---|
| BK JIP Pardubice | 82-92 L | 98-110 L |
| GAPA Hradec Kralove | 111-87 W | 89-82 W |
| Record vs common | 1 W 0 D 1 L | 1 W 0 D 1 L |
Better against common opponents: Sokol Pisek (2 of 2 head-to-heads won)
Last 10 matches played
The averages above come from these matches. W = win, D = draw, L = loss. Common opponents to both are in blue.
Sokol Pisek
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | FT | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/10 | USK Praha Czechia NBL |
89-105 | L |
| 30/09 | BK JIP Pardubice Czechia NBL |
82-92 | L |
| 27/09 | Lokomotiva Plzen Czechia NBL |
88-81 | W |
| 23/09 | GAPA Hradec Kralove Czechia NBL |
111-87 | W |
| 20/09 | Usti Nad Labem Czechia NBL |
80-78 | W |
| 05/05 | BK JIP Pardubice Czechia NBL |
71-79 | L |
| 04/05 | BK JIP Pardubice Czechia NBL |
63-78 | L |
| 01/05 | BK JIP Pardubice Czechia NBL |
74-78 | L |
| 30/04 | BK JIP Pardubice Czechia NBL |
81-99 | L |
| 23/04 | USK Praha Czechia NBL |
100-92 | W |
NH Ostrava
Swipe the table sideways →
| Date | Opponent | FT | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03/10 | BK JIP Pardubice Czechia NBL |
98-110 | L |
| 30/09 | GAPA Hradec Kralove Czechia NBL |
89-82 | W |
| 27/09 | BK Olomoucko Czechia NBL |
76-77 | L |
| 23/09 | Brno Czechia NBL |
85-76 | W |
| 19/09 | BK Opava Czechia NBL |
89-77 | W |
| 05/05 | ERA Nymburk Czechia NBL |
70-116 | L |
| 04/05 | ERA Nymburk Czechia NBL |
71-93 | L |
| 01/05 | ERA Nymburk Czechia NBL |
67-101 | L |
| 30/04 | ERA Nymburk Czechia NBL |
69-113 | L |
| 24/04 | BK Olomoucko Czechia NBL |
102-71 | W |
Frequently asked questions
Who is the favourite in Sokol Pisek vs NH Ostrava?
Our model gives 70% to Sokol Pisek.
How many points are expected in Sokol Pisek vs NH Ostrava?
The model estimates 174.7 total points (Sokol Pisek 91 · NH Ostrava 83.7).
Over or under 175.5 points?
Recent history points to under 175.5 points (68%).

