Pronóstico: APIA Leichardt (W) vs Western City Rangers (W)
| APIA Leichardt (W) | Empate | Western City Rangers (W) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nuestro modelo | 76% | 14% | 10% |
| Mercado | 86% | 9% | 6% |
La barra de arriba combina nuestro modelo con el mercado: donde nuestra probabilidad más se separa de la cuota es donde el modelo ve la mayor diferencia.
Claves del partido
- Nuestro modelo (Elo, ajustado por la calidad del rival) hace favorito a APIA Leichardt (W) (rating 1558 vs 1371).
- Historial directo a favor de APIA Leichardt (W): 3-0-1.
Estadísticas · 10/10 partidos analizados
F = a favor · C = en contra · HT = al descanso · FT = final del partido
| APIA Leichardt (W) | Western City Rangers (W) | |
|---|---|---|
| Goles a favor / en contra (FT) | 2.3 / 1.6 | 0.7 / 3.2 |
| Goles a favor / en contra (HT) | 0.8 / 0.7 | 0.2 / 1.6 |
| Resultado al descanso (V/E/D) | 40/10/50% | 10/20/70% |
| Córners (HT / FT) | 2.4 / 5.2 | 2 / 4.3 |
| Tarjetas (🟨 / 🟥) | 1.8 / 0.1 | 2.1 / 0.1 |
Enfrentamientos directos (H2H) · APIA Leichardt (W) 3–0–1 Western City Rangers (W)
Desliza la tabla horizontalmente →
| Fecha | Local | Marcador | Visitante |
|---|---|---|---|
| 12/04/26 Australia New South Wales NPL Women | Western City Rangers (W) | 1-4 HT 0-1 | APIA Leichardt (W) |
| 17/07/25 Australia New South Wales Cup Women | APIA Leichardt (W) | 3-0 HT 2-0 | Western City Rangers (W) |
| 29/06/25 Australia New South Wales NPL Women | APIA Leichardt (W) | 2-0 HT 1-0 | Western City Rangers (W) |
| 30/03/25 Australia New South Wales NPL Women | Western City Rangers (W) | 2-0 HT 0-0 | APIA Leichardt (W) |
Clasificación · Australia New South Wales NPL Women
Desliza la tabla horizontalmente →
| # | Equipo | PJ | G | E | P | GF | GC | Pts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | University NSW (W) | 18 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 39 | 13 | 43 |
| 2 | Bulls FC Academy (W) | 18 | 13 | 4 | 1 | 48 | 16 | 43 |
| 3 | APIA Leichardt (W) | 18 | 13 | 1 | 4 | 46 | 23 | 40 |
| 4 | Western Sydney Wanderers NPL (W) | 17 | 11 | 4 | 2 | 33 | 18 | 37 |
| 5 | Sydney University (W) | 18 | 8 | 4 | 6 | 41 | 32 | 28 |
| 6 | Northern Tigers FC (W) | 18 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 29 | 25 | 24 |
| 7 | Manly Utd (W) | 18 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 29 | 24 | 23 |
| 8 | Gladesville Ravens (W) | 18 | 6 | 3 | 9 | 26 | 32 | 21 |
| 9 | Macarthur Rams (W) | 17 | 6 | 3 | 8 | 24 | 29 | 21 |
| 10 | Sydney Olympic FC (W) | 18 | 6 | 2 | 10 | 32 | 35 | 20 |
| 11 | Hills United FC (W) | 18 | 5 | 2 | 11 | 19 | 28 | 17 |
| 12 | Illawarra Stingrays (W) | 18 | 3 | 5 | 10 | 15 | 28 | 14 |
| 13 | NWS Spirit (W) | 18 | 4 | 1 | 13 | 22 | 68 | 13 |
| 14 | Western City Rangers (W) | 18 | 2 | 2 | 14 | 17 | 49 | 8 |
Rivales en común 8 rivales
Cómo le fue a cada equipo contra los mismos rivales recientes
| Rival | APIA Leichardt (W) | Western City Rangers (W) |
|---|---|---|
| NWS Spirit (W) | 2-1 V | 0-4 D |
| Manly Utd (W) | 2-1 V | 1-1 E |
| Macarthur Rams (W) | 2-1 V | 1-2 D |
| Hills United FC (W) | 4-1 V | 0-1 D |
| Sydney University (W) | 3-0 V | 2-5 D |
| Western Sydney Wanderers NPL (W) | 2-3 D | 1-4 D |
| University NSW (W) | 0-1 D | 1-2 D |
| Gladesville Ravens (W) | 2-3 D | 0-6 D |
| Balance vs comunes | 5 V 0 E 3 D | 0 V 1 E 7 D |
Mejor contra rivales comunes: APIA Leichardt (W) (7 de 8 cruces a favor)
Últimos 10 partidos jugados
De aquí salen las medias de arriba. V = victoria, E = empate, D = derrota. En azul, los rivales comunes a ambos.
APIA Leichardt (W)
Desliza la tabla horizontalmente →
| Fecha | Rival | HT | FT | Córn. | Tarj. | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5/7 | NWS Spirit (W) Australia New South Wales NPL Women |
1-0 | 2-1 | 5 | 3 | V |
| 28/6 | Manly Utd (W) Australia New South Wales NPL Women |
0-1 | 2-1 | 5 | 0 | V |
| 21/6 | Macarthur Rams (W) Australia New South Wales NPL Women |
2-0 | 2-1 | 1 | 1 | V |
| 14/6 | Hills United FC (W) Australia New South Wales NPL Women |
2-1 | 4-1 | 6 | 4 | V |
| 7/6 | Sydney University (W) Australia New South Wales NPL Women |
0-0 | 3-0 | 7 | 2 | V |
| 31/5 | Northern Tigers FC (W) Australia New South Wales NPL Women |
0-1 | 1-4 | 7 | 2 | D |
| 24/5 | Western Sydney Wanderers NPL (W) Australia New South Wales NPL Women |
0-1 | 2-3 | 2 | 0 | D |
| 21/5 | University NSW (W) Australia New South Wales Cup Women |
0-1 | 0-1 | 3 | 2 | D |
| 17/5 | Illawarra Stingrays (W) Australia New South Wales NPL Women |
2-0 | 5-1 | 5 | 2 | V |
| 10/5 | Gladesville Ravens (W) Australia New South Wales NPL Women |
1-2 | 2-3 | 11 | 3 | D |
Western City Rangers (W)
Desliza la tabla horizontalmente →
| Fecha | Rival | HT | FT | Córn. | Tarj. | Res. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5/7 | Manly Utd (W) Australia New South Wales NPL Women |
0-0 | 1-1 | 8 | 1 | E |
| 28/6 | Sydney University (W) Australia New South Wales NPL Women |
0-2 | 2-5 | 6 | 0 | D |
| 21/6 | Gladesville Ravens (W) Australia New South Wales NPL Women |
0-4 | 0-6 | 9 | 3 | D |
| 13/6 | NWS Spirit (W) Australia New South Wales NPL Women |
0-3 | 0-4 | 3 | 2 | D |
| 6/6 | University NSW (W) Australia New South Wales NPL Women |
0-1 | 1-2 | 3 | 3 | D |
| 31/5 | Bulls FC Academy (W) Australia New South Wales NPL Women |
0-1 | 0-4 | 1 | 2 | D |
| 24/5 | Macarthur Rams (W) Australia New South Wales NPL Women |
1-1 | 1-2 | 4 | 4 | D |
| 17/5 | Sydney Olympic FC (W) Australia New South Wales NPL Women |
1-0 | 1-3 | 5 | 4 | D |
| 10/5 | Hills United FC (W) Australia New South Wales NPL Women |
0-1 | 0-1 | 1 | 2 | D |
| 3/5 | Western Sydney Wanderers NPL (W) Australia New South Wales NPL Women |
0-3 | 1-4 | 3 | 1 | D |
Preguntas frecuentes
¿Quién es favorito en APIA Leichardt (W) vs Western City Rangers (W)?
Según nuestro modelo, el resultado más probable es la victoria de APIA Leichardt (W) (82%). Probabilidades: APIA Leichardt (W) 82%, empate 11%, Western City Rangers (W) 7%.
¿Cuántos goles se esperan en APIA Leichardt (W) vs Western City Rangers (W)?
El modelo espera 4,3 goles (APIA Leichardt (W) 3,15 · Western City Rangers (W) 1,15), con un 52% a más de 4 goles.
¿Marcarán ambos equipos en APIA Leichardt (W) vs Western City Rangers (W)?
El modelo da un 58% a que ambos equipos marquen.
¿Cuál es el marcador más probable?
El marcador más probable según nuestro modelo es 3-1.

